Coronial
WAcommunity

Inquest into the Death of Njana

Deceased

Hendrick Njana

Demographics

24y, male

Date of death

2008-12-30

Finding date

2010-12-21

Cause of death

left intracerebral haemorrhage and consequential brain bleeding resulting from head injuries caused by assault

AI-generated summary

Hendrick Njana, a 24-year-old Aboriginal male, was assaulted on 27 December 2008 by Shaun Steven Midd at a service station in Broome, suffering a strike to the head causing unconsciousness, kicks to the head with steel-capped boots, and skull fractures. Police arrested Njana at the scene despite CCTV evidence showing he was a victim, not an offender. He was taken to Broome District Hospital where Dr Kriek examined him, incorrectly recorded the injury timing as 6pm rather than 8pm, and allowed discharge against medical advice. Njana was re-arrested as he left hospital, taken to Broome Police Station cells, and found unconscious at 4:45am. He died on 30 December 2008 at Royal Perth Hospital from left intracerebral haemorrhage and consequential brain bleeding from the head injuries. The coroner found serious failures: inadequate handover of medical information to police, failure to obtain details of hospital treatment, poor cell monitoring, and failure to record CCTV. However, medical evidence indicated Njana would likely not have survived regardless of earlier detection.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicineintensive careneurology

Error types

communicationdelaysystem

Drugs involved

alcoholanti-epilepticssedation

Clinical conditions

head traumaskull fractures (bilateral temporal bone fractures)subdural haematomaintracerebral haemorrhagetraumatic brain injuryloss of consciousnessseizuresalcohol intoxication

Procedures

CT scanintubationsedationanti-epileptic therapy

Contributing factors

  • assault with kicks to the head causing skull fractures
  • misrecording of injury timing by treating physician (6pm vs 8pm)
  • discharge against medical advice from hospital
  • failure of police to obtain details of hospital treatment
  • re-arrest of victim without medical assessment
  • inadequate cell monitoring in police custody
  • failure to communicate medical concerns to custodial staff
  • separation of patient from partner and medication
  • lack of CCTV recording capability in cells

Coroner's recommendations

  1. In cases where police arrange for an injured victim of a crime of violence or an injured person in custody to be taken to hospital, police and nursing staff should ensure that a reliable history is taken prior to departure of police, particularly if the injured person is under the influence of alcohol
  2. The Custody Handover Summary should require entry of a summary of any medical treatment or medical assessment made in respect of any prisoner who has been seen by a medical practitioner shortly before being taken into custody or while in custody
  3. The Custody Handover Summary should record contact details for a medical practitioner or other person who can provide advice in the event that the condition of a prisoner deteriorates and can provide advice as to the nature of any specific observations required
  4. WA Police should ensure that CCTV coverage of cells in police stations is recorded so that in the event of a death in custody or serious incident within the cells, that recording will be available
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.