Coronial
WAother

Inquest into the Death of Brian John KEALY

Deceased

Brian John Kealy

Demographics

42y, male

Date of death

2024-08-02

Finding date

2026-03-26

Cause of death

Ligature compression of the neck (hanging)

AI-generated summary

Brian Kealy, aged 42, died by suicide via hanging at Hakea Prison on 2 August 2024 while on remand. He had complex mental health needs including probable schizophrenia, anti-social personality disorder, and polysubstance use disorder. The coroner found the quality of mental health care provided was poor, attributable to systemic fragmentation between Psychological Health Services and Prison Mental Health teams operating in treatment silos without multidisciplinary meetings or effective information sharing. Dr F., a senior psychiatric registrar (not consultant psychiatrist) covering for an absent senior clinician, ceased olanzapine medication in May 2024, characterizing Brian's requests for reinstatement as drug-seeking behaviour despite his documented therapeutic response. Independent psychiatrist Dr B. opined olanzapine should have been continued. The coroner identified staff shortages, inadequate psychiatric oversight, failures in clinical governance, and poor information access as contributing factors. Five recommendations addressed systemic issues including multidisciplinary care models, information systems integration, and staffing adequacy.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Fragmentation of mental health and psychological services
  • Poor information sharing between PHS and PMH teams
  • Disagreement about diagnosis and medication management between teams
  • Inadequate senior psychiatric oversight and clinical governance
  • Cessation of olanzapine without appropriate psychiatric review
  • Staff shortages and excessive caseloads
  • Lack of multidisciplinary team meetings
  • Failure to access Dr H.'s comprehensive psychiatric assessment
  • Treatment silos preventing coordinated care
  • Characterization of mental health concerns as drug-seeking behaviour

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Ensure Psychological Health Services (PHS) and prison mental health clinicians have reciprocal access to prisoner information stored in EcHO computer system and TOMS PHS module
  2. Review delivery of mental health and psychological services at Hakea Prison; form project group with Department of Health to determine feasibility of DoH assuming responsibility for prisoner health care (including primary, psychiatric, psychological care); assess adopting multidisciplinary model of mental and psychological health care led by psychiatrist with clear clinical governance
  3. Ensure all available medical, psychiatric and other reports relevant to prisoner care and treatment are freely available to treating mental health and psychological clinicians; identify and remove legislative, policy or other barriers to access
  4. Ensure compliance with EMF-DIR-022 Operational debriefing policy; ensure personnel involved in critical incidents participate in immediate and formal debriefs; disseminate lessons learned reports to relevant staff including those involved in emergency response skills
  5. Conduct review of mental health and psychological health clinician staffing levels at Hakea Prison to determine adequacy; redouble recruitment efforts to fill vacant positions; review salary and other benefits with view to attracting appropriately qualified clinicians
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —