Inquest into the Death of Joshua Fredrik VAN MALSSEN
Deceased
Joshua Fredrik Van Malssen
Demographics
24y, male
Date of death
2023-06-16
Finding date
2026-02-02
Cause of death
Cardiac arrest in a man with Sotos syndrome and multiple comorbidities, including, complex heart disease, asthma, early bronchopneumonia and obesity, while being restrained in a prone position, with alcohol effect
AI-generated summary
Joshua Fredrik Van Malssen, 24, with Sotos syndrome, dilated cardiomyopathy, asthma, and WHO class III obesity (BMI 40.6) died from cardiac arrest on 16 June 2023 after being restrained in prone position by PTA transit officers at Perth Underground Train Station. Following disorderly conduct and alcohol intoxication, officers used a harness takedown and handcuffs to detain him. While restrained, Josh experienced cardiac arrest and despite CPR resuscitation, could not be revived at Royal Perth Hospital. The coroner found the arrest was lawful and justified, but the monitoring standard was poor. Officers failed to notice Josh had stopped breathing until his face changed colour. The coroner could not establish earlier CPR would have changed the outcome, but made five recommendations: enhance officer training on positional asphyxia risks and monitoring procedures, provide contextualised life support training, reassess handcuff fit for larger individuals, consult police on alternative restraints, and establish formal critical incident review and lessons-sharing protocols.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- Restraint in prone position
- Pre-existing dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery atherosclerosis
- Pre-existing asthma and obstructive lung disease with early bronchopneumonia
- Obesity (BMI 40.6)
- Alcohol intoxication (blood alcohol 0.174%)
- Physical exertion and stress during altercation
- Sotos syndrome
- Poor monitoring while restrained
Coroner's recommendations
- The PTA should take immediate steps to ensure transit officers are keenly aware that persons being detained in the prone position are at grave risk of experiencing positional asphyxia and the need to minimise the time people spend in that position, including: liaising with WAPOL to determine applicable resources and policies; revising the Defensive Tactics Manual to be more detailed and prescriptive with concrete examples of risk factors and signs/symptoms; including information about Josh's case and lessons learned; and emphasising persons must only be restrained in prone position for as short a time as possible
- The PTA should consider providing contextualised life support training to transit officers during the Transit Officer Recruit Training program and during annual refresher courses
- The PTA should reassess ASP Hinged Ultra-Cuff handcuffs to determine whether they are fit for purpose when detaining persons of large build, and if not, whether an alternative type of restraint device should be made available
- The PTA should liaise with WAPOL to determine whether the type of leg strap restraint used by WAPOL would be suitable for use by PTA transit officers
- The PTA should ensure that a formal review is conducted following any critical incident involving transit guards where death or serious injury occurs, and that lessons learned from such reviews are provided to all PTA transit officers
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —