Coronial
WAother

Inquest into the Death of Leslie SHORTTE

Deceased

Leslie SHORTTE

Demographics

71y, male

Coroner

Coroner Jenkin

Date of death

2020-03-03

Finding date

2022-09-15

Cause of death

Complications of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (terminal palliation)

AI-generated summary

Leslie Shortte, a 71-year-old life prisoner, died from metastatic squamous cell carcinoma with complications. Critical failures in his prison medical care included: failure to complete annual health assessments after 2015; inadequate follow-up of a high-risk squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) lesion identified in April 2019 that was never re-excised; unacceptable delays in investigating a neck mass (ultrasound not arranged despite recognition of need to exclude sinister pathology); and reliance on a flawed 'paper slip' appointment system that depended on prisoner self-management. While the SCC may have already been metastatic when first identified, systemic failures in follow-up and screening fell short of both community standards and departmental policies. The coroner found medical care suboptimal but noted no evidence these failures changed the ultimate outcome.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

oncologypalliative carecorrectional healthgeneral practiceemergency medicinepathology

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

lidocainemidazolammorphineparacetamolantibiotics

Clinical conditions

squamous cell carcinoma of neckmetastatic squamous cell carcinomapulmonary metastasesparotid gland involvementcervical lymph node metastasesaspiration pneumoniapulmonary embolihypercalcaemiapleural effusiondeliriumarterial atherosclerosis

Procedures

lesion removalskin biopsyCT scanPET scanultrasoundradiotherapycryotherapysurgical drainage of neck lesion

Contributing factors

  • Failure to complete annual health assessments between 2016 and 2019
  • Inadequate follow-up of high-risk squamous cell carcinoma after initial removal
  • Unacceptable delay in arranging ultrasound of neck mass
  • Flawed 'paper slip' appointment booking system relying on prisoner self-management
  • Lack of backup system for missed clinical appointments
  • Failure to update active problem list in EcHO with SCC diagnosis
  • Inadequate addressing of heavy smoking
  • Prisoner's pattern of refusing diagnostic tests and medical treatment
  • Lack of follow-up for non-attendance at critical appointments
  • Failure to consider early release under Royal Prerogative of Mercy when prisoner classified as Stage 3/4 terminally ill

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Reinforce requirements of COPP 6.2 to ensure briefing notes for early release of Stage 3/4 terminally ill prisoners under Royal Prerogative of Mercy are prepared in a timely manner
  2. Implement compliance reporting on annual health assessments for each prison with rankings by age and colour flags for high-risk conditions
  3. Ensure PMO education on proper use of EcHO 'interventions' functionality for follow-up appointments
  4. Emphasise importance of updating prisoners' active problem lists in EcHO to ensure visibility of critical diagnoses
  5. Implement backup systems to ensure follow-up of missed clinical appointments
  6. Abandon reliance on 'paper slip' appointment booking systems in favour of electronic systems with alerts
  7. Conduct full skin checks for all prisoners with history of skin malignancy
  8. Provide PMO training on EcHO functionality and screening guidelines
  9. Prioritise screening of prisoners with high-risk medical conditions
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.