Coronial
WAhospital

Inquest into the Death of Robert Charles CRAIG

Deceased

Robert Charles CRAIG

Demographics

73y, male

Coroner

Coroner Jenkin

Date of death

2018-01-31

Finding date

2021-09-29

Cause of death

Disseminated malignancy (advanced lung carcinoma and mouth carcinoma) in a man with co-morbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

AI-generated summary

Robert Craig, aged 73, died from disseminated malignancy (advanced lung and mouth carcinoma) while in prison custody. He received suboptimal cancer treatment at Fiona Stanley Hospital due to communication failures between oncology teams managing his two unrelated cancers. Key errors included: failure to arrange post-operative radiotherapy for oral cancer; inappropriate chemotherapy (Cetuximab for lung cancer instead of standard carboplatin/etoposide); and a 61-day delay in transmitting critical correspondence. While the coroner found these treatment errors were not causative of death given the aggressive cancer biology, systemic failures were identified: incompatible computer systems (BossNet and MOSAIQ), inadequate multidisciplinary team note documentation, poor care coordination, and insufficient complex cancer care coordinators. The coroner made recommendations to improve MDT note quality and enhance the e-referral system.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

oncologyradiation oncologyoral and maxillofacial surgeryrespiratory medicinepalliative carecorrectional health

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

cetuximabcarboplatinetoposidefurosemidehaloperidolmidazolammorphinelidocaineranitidine

Clinical conditions

lung canceroral cancersquamous cell carcinomametastatic liver diseasechronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseischaemic heart diseasecolostomypost-traumatic stress disorder

Procedures

oral cancer surgeryjaw reconstructionradiotherapychemotherapy administration

Contributing factors

  • Failure to arrange post-operative radiotherapy for oral cancer following surgical removal
  • Administration of inappropriate chemotherapy (Cetuximab for lung cancer instead of carboplatin and etoposide)
  • Poor communication between Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology departments
  • Delayed transmission of critical clinical correspondence (61-day delay in Dr T.'s letter)
  • Incompatible computer systems (BossNet and MOSAIQ) limiting information sharing
  • Suboptimal multidisciplinary team note documentation
  • Inadequate care coordination for complex multi-cancer case
  • Insufficient complex cancer care coordinators
  • Reliance on junior staff for MDT note-taking without supervision
  • Unclear e-referral communication regarding treatment modality

Coroner's recommendations

  1. To ensure the accuracy of notes and treatment plans recorded following multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) held at Fiona Stanley Hospital, MDT notes should be taken by a suitably experienced clinician or health practitioner. Where this is not possible, MDT notes should be checked by a suitably experienced clinician prior to being circulated.
  2. To ensure that referrals are triaged appropriately and in a timely manner, the e-Referral system used at Fiona Stanley Hospital should be modified to include a text box requiring the referring clinician to state the reason for the referral and, in general terms, the nature of the treatment or service being requested.
  3. Urgent liaison between South Metropolitan Health Service and the Western Australian Health Department to prioritise implementation of a state-wide Oncology Information System (OIS).
  4. South Metropolitan Health Service should support employment of additional Complex Cancer Care Coordinators at Fiona Stanley Hospital across cancer specialties.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.