Inquest into the Death of Corazon Contreras KEELEY
Deceased
Corazon Contreras KEELEY
Demographics
71y, female
Coroner
Coroner Urquhart
Date of death
2020-07-27
Finding date
2023-10-18
Cause of death
complications of metastatic endometrial carcinoma, treated palliatively
AI-generated summary
Corazon Contreras Keeley, a 71-year-old woman with postmenopausal bleeding, was investigated for possible endometrial cancer. Dr Venkata Kasina performed a hysteroscopy with dilation and curettage (HDC) on 29 November 2019, observing a concerning lesion but documenting findings as routine. The resulting histopathology (5 December 2019) recommended further sampling due to possible atypical glandular epithelium potentially indicating cancer. Dr Kasina failed to recognize this critical recommendation, incorrectly advising the patient and GP that results were normal. A second HDC on 28 February 2020 revealed high-grade undifferentiated malignancy, confirming endometrial cancer with poor prognosis. The diagnosis delay of approximately 6-7 weeks, though likely not altering survival outcome, was preventable through proper attention to the first pathology report and timely repeat sampling. Systemic failures included inadequate result notification, lack of consultant handover during leave, and delayed open disclosure to the family.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
hysteroscopy with dilation and curettageCT scanningPET scanningcystoscopyureteric stent insertionlaparotomyradical hysterectomybilateral salpingo-oophorectomyomentectomychemotherapyradiotherapy
Contributing factors
failure to respond appropriately to first histopathology report recommendation for further sampling
failure to recognize concerning lesion during hysteroscopy despite visible abnormalities on images
mischaracterization of histopathology results as 'nil abnormal' when they indicated possible atypical glandular epithelium
inappropriate discharge from gynaecology care after first HDC
delayed notification of cancer diagnosis to patient (8 days post-confirmation)
lack of consultant handover for ongoing cases during leave
absence of systematic notification that pathology results are available
delayed and inadequate open disclosure to patient and family
fragmented care across multiple hospital sites
Coroner's recommendations
Implementation and prioritization of funding for Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system across public hospitals to ensure pathology results are acted upon in a timely manner with built-in checks and balances
Establishment of systematic notification processes when pathology results become available to clinicians
Formalization of handover procedures for ongoing patient cases when consultants take leave, particularly for cases where pathology results are pending
Enhanced education and training for all staff regarding open disclosure processes and requirements of the Australian Open Disclosure Framework
Implementation of dedicated specialist clinics for post-menopausal bleeding with nurse coordinators ensuring timely follow-up (now in place)
Establishment of weekly clinics for registrars to manage outstanding gynaecology results and chart-outs
Creation of multi-disciplinary team meetings to review complex gynaecology cases fortnightly
Establishment of mortality and morbidity meetings in gynaecology to discuss complications and trended data
Creation of hysteroscopic-specific outpatient clinics for post-menopausal bleeding with review within one month
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.