Coronial
WAhospital

Inquest into the Death of Giovanni Bertoncini

Deceased

Giovanni Bertoncini

Demographics

72y, male

Date of death

2002-12-27

Finding date

2005-03-03

Cause of death

acute gangrene of colon with probable perforation along with bowel obstruction and cardiac failure in a man with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, severe coronary atherosclerosis and known valvular heart disease

AI-generated summary

Giovanni Bertoncini, a 72-year-old man with diabetes and cardiac disease, presented to Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital on Christmas Day 2002 with acute abdominal pain and vomiting. Over two days, his condition deteriorated but ischaemic bowel disease was not diagnosed until the afternoon of 27 December, by which time it was too late for surgical intervention. The coroner found that surgical opinion should have been sought on 26 December when the patient's condition was clearly worsening. A clear management plan addressing deterioration, earlier surgical consultation, and consideration of after-hours imaging for potentially life-threatening but undiagnosed conditions could have changed the outcome. The coroner emphasised that ischaemic bowel is a surgical emergency requiring aggressive early management.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinegeneral medicinegeneral surgeryradiology

Error types

diagnosticdelay

Drugs involved

paracetamolmorphinepethidinetramadol

Clinical conditions

ischaemic bowelbowel obstructionacute gangrene of colonperforationtype 2 diabetes mellituscoronary atherosclerosisvalvular heart diseasecardiac failureclostridium infection

Procedures

ultrasound examinationCT scanlaparotomy

Contributing factors

  • failure to diagnose ischaemic bowel until 27 December when too late for surgery
  • failure to seek surgical opinion until afternoon of 27 December
  • inadequate consideration of ischaemic bowel in differential diagnosis on 26 December despite patient risk factors and deteriorating condition
  • lack of clear management plan to guide escalation in event of deterioration
  • failure to perform imaging studies on 26 December despite deteriorating condition
  • delayed ultrasound examination (ordered 26 December, performed 27 December)
  • inadequate pain management
  • insufficient regular review despite undiagnosed abdominal pain in Acute Assessment Unit
  • small segment of bowel affected resulting in atypical early presentation

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Doctors at all levels should be encouraged to write clear plans of management which would include guidance to junior medical and nursing staff, particularly when a clear diagnosis has not been made, as to the action to be taken in the event of unexpected changes in a patient's condition
  2. In the case of undiagnosed abdominal pain in relatively elderly patients, the plans should require consideration of urgent surgical review in the event of a patient's condition deteriorating unexpectedly
  3. The Health Department should promote awareness of ischaemic bowel and encourage close monitoring of undiagnosed abdominal pain with a view to early detection of the condition
  4. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital should have in place sufficient resources to enable after-hours imaging. When a definite diagnosis cannot be reached and a possible diagnosis which cannot be excluded is potentially life threatening within a short period of time, consideration should be given to ordering after hours imaging
  5. In determining the priority to be given to conducting diagnostic tests, consideration should be given not only to diagnoses considered most likely, but also consideration should be given to the consequences which might flow if other diagnoses, which have not been excluded, prove to be correct
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.