Pulmonary tuberculosis in a man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with terminal comfort care
AI-generated summary
A 60-year-old man remanded in custody died from pulmonary tuberculosis complicated by severe COPD. Key clinical issues included: delayed diagnosis (TB not suspected at intake despite respiratory symptoms), patient's refusal of nutritional support and rehabilitation (malnutrition worsened outcomes), uncontrolled depression affecting treatment engagement, and progressive multi-organ failure from sepsis and heart involvement. The coroner found medical care at FSH was of a high standard with appropriate specialist input (respiratory, infectious diseases, psychiatry), but identified systemic failures in recording terminally ill status and inappropriate application of physical restraints during transfers, contrary to policy. Clinical lessons include importance of TB screening in prison intake, nutritional assessment and intervention in chronic respiratory disease, early mental health support to improve treatment engagement, and multidisciplinary team coordination in managing complex terminal illness.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
respiratory medicineinfectious diseasesintensive careemergency medicinepsychiatrycorrectional health
Active pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosed during first admission
Severe pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (emphysema)
Significant malnutrition and deconditioning
Patient refusal of nutritional intervention and rehabilitation
Low mood and lack of motivation despite psychiatric intervention
Multi-organ sepsis on second admission
Acute decline in kidney function
Heart damage (elevated troponin)
TB-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
Progressive lung failure with secondary cardiac involvement
Failure to update terminally ill status on electronic systems
Application of restraints contrary to policy on two occasions
No TB screening at prison intake despite respiratory risk factors
Coroner's recommendations
Implement automatic population of terminally ill status from Terminally Ill Register to TOMS Medical Status module and Offender Movement Information (OMI) module to prompt consideration of External Movement Risk Assessment (EMRA) requirements.
Target date of 30 June 2026 for TOMS system upgrades to ensure Terminally Ill field is simultaneously updated when a prisoner transitions through terminally ill stages.
Create interface between Terminally Ill list and OMI on TOMS to ensure accurate recording when prisoners are transferred.
Continue focus on implementing system improvements to assist health services and custodial staff to comply with Commissioner's Operating Policies and Procedures relating to restraints and ensure comfort and dignity of terminally ill prisoners.
Consider whether the Department's Operations Centre (available 24/7) would be better suited to conducting oversight reviews of restraint application compared to the Operational Compliance Team (weekday only).
Continue TB screening as part of routine blood tests upon prison admission (newly implemented practice).
Ensure clarity in TOMS Medical Status module regarding responsibility for recording prisoner terminally ill status (health services responsibility).
Disseminate guidance to medical officers regarding updating TOMS Medical Status module to reflect terminally ill status (Dr G. to produce short guide and PM30 Policy and Procedure to be updated).
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.