Complications in association with intestinal volvulus
AI-generated summary
31-year-old Morgan Edwards with Smith-Magenis Syndrome, cerebral palsy and Crohn's disease was discharged from Fiona Stanley Hospital ED on 14 August 2018 without definitive diagnosis despite elevated respiration rate, unsuccessful imaging attempts, and elevated lactate levels. He was sent home unaccompanied by a care worker to a group home with no registered nurses, contrary to disability service guidelines. Dr S.' discharge decision was based on erroneous assumption of nursing availability. Care home staff later failed to return him to hospital despite obvious clinical deterioration and abnormal EWS scores following discharge. When finally re-admitted the following afternoon, he was critically unwell with intestinal volvulus, sepsis and pneumonia. He died despite emergency surgery preparation. Key failures included: absence of supporting care worker at initial ED visit, inadequate discharge communication, flawed EWS system not accounting for recent hospitalisation, and low threshold for re-escalation at group home despite clear clinical concerns.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
emergency medicinegastroenterologyanaesthesiaintensive caregeneral practice
Absence of support person/care worker accompanying non-verbal patient to emergency department
Erroneous assumption by registrar that care home had registered nurses for monitoring
Failure to obtain imaging due to patient agitation and decision not to sedate
Discharge without definitive diagnosis despite elevated respiration rate (26 breaths/minute) and elevated lactate
Lack of clear documentation of discharge reasoning and instructions
Inadequate discharge plan providing vague monitoring instructions without specific symptom guidance
Failure of care home staff to return patient to hospital despite clinical deterioration
Early Warning Score system that resets to zero after hospital discharge without accounting for recent hospitalisation
Care home staffing lacking registered nurses despite patient's complex needs
Failure to escalate within care home despite EWS scores of 5 and documented clinical concerns
Limited collateral history available to ED staff due to absence of familiar care worker
Intermittent presentation of volvulus making diagnosis challenging
Coroner's recommendations
Identitywa should urgently amend its 'Going to Hospital Guidance' and 'On Call File: Responsibilities' documents to clearly state that residents will always be accompanied by a care worker to hospital except where resident has capacity and declines support or guardian/next-of-kin attends instead
Identitywa should issue urgent bulletin to all staff reminding them of the current policy regarding hospital admissions and respective responsibilities of care workers, team leaders and On-Call
Identitywa should engage suitably qualified health professional to review Early Warning Score system and amend the EWS Response Chart to account for residents recently discharged from hospital who are still exhibiting symptoms, and to ensure observations after discharge do not automatically start at score of zero
Identitywa should amend Transfer to Hospital file documentation to include (on front) a single A4 summary sheet with critical information about resident (NOK details, medical conditions, medications, allergies) and brief statement of reason for referral to hospital
South Metropolitan Health Service should amend discharge summary policy to provide greater clarity and detailed instructions regarding symptoms to be monitored and circumstances for hospital re-admission, with particular attention to non-verbal patients and residents of supported accommodation without clinical staff
South Metropolitan Health Service should advise ED clinicians to adopt lower threshold for admission for non-verbal patients where no definitive diagnosis has been established following initial assessment and examination
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.