A 3-day-old neonate died from complications of instrumental forceps delivery, specifically subgaleal haemorrhage with associated skull fracture and intracranial bleeding. Critical clinical lessons include: (1) complex forceps deliveries with red flags (malposition, failed initial application, fetal bradycardia) should be escalated to operating theatre with consultant supervision rather than attempted in birthing suite; (2) subgaleal haemorrhage risk was high (APGAR <7 at 5 min, prolonged labour, multiple pulls) yet scalp observations were delayed due to CPAP bonnet obscuring assessment; (3) early recognition of SGH would have allowed earlier tailored resuscitation and optimized chances of survival; (4) confirmation bias led clinicians to focus on sepsis rather than haemorrhagic shock. Key preventive measures: transfer to theatre when red flags appear, implement robust scalp monitoring protocols post-instrumental delivery, improve situational awareness in neonatal resuscitation, and develop statewide guidelines for massive transfusion in neonates.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
forceps deliverymanual rotation of foetal headepisiotomyintermittent positive pressure ventilationintubationumbilical line insertioncranial ultrasoundabdominal ultrasoundpoint of care cardiac ultrasound
Contributing factors
Decision to proceed with instrumental delivery in birthing suite rather than operating theatre
Multiple red flags not prompting escalation: fetal malposition, failed forceps application on first attempt, fetal bradycardia with manual rotation
Delayed recognition of subgaleal haemorrhage (identified between 3-5 hours after birth rather than in first 2-4 hours)
CPAP bonnet obscuring scalp assessment and preventing early detection
Absence of formal scalp observation protocol and checks in first critical hours
Confirmation bias in differential diagnosis: focus on sepsis rather than haemorrhagic shock
Loss of situational awareness during resuscitation without structured pause/reassessment tool
Lack of escalation to consultant obstetrician for second opinion despite multiple warning signs
Prolonged second stage of labour (>2 hours with abnormal CTG) not prompting transfer to theatre for reassessment
Coroner's recommendations
That the Royal Children's Hospital formulate a statewide Clinical Practice Guideline (or update the existing 'Blood product prescription' Clinical Practice Guideline) regarding neonatal/paediatric patients who trigger criteria for a massive transfusion protocol response, including the stocking or sourcing of rFVIIa (NovoSeven)
Targeted education on subgaleal haemorrhage within NICU encompassing assessment, recognition, best practice management, appropriate choice of headgear and escalation (implemented by Western Health)
Expand non-technical skills component of in-situ simulation training within NICU including senior medical staff to improve situational awareness and embed resuscitation pause tools to reduce confirmation bias (implemented as RESQUE tool)
Complex forceps delivery including high head with manual rotation will be undertaken in the operating theatre by suitably credentialled and experienced clinician(s) (implemented)
Critical Bleeding and Massive Transfusion Protocol reviewed for specific level 6 NICU requirements (implemented)
Interdepartmental simulations to test Critical Bleeding and MTP to improve system responsiveness (completed)
Return to paper-based workflows in NICU for emergency situations rather than EMR-dependent documentation (implemented)
Clinical interviews following serious adverse patient safety events to be formally scheduled for all clinicians as close as possible to time of event
Promote awareness and accessibility of existing guidelines relating to incident support and clinical debrief following serious clinical events
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.