Pulmonary thromboembolism in the setting of deep leg vein thrombosis
AI-generated summary
A 74-year-old man died from pulmonary thromboembolism with deep vein thrombosis 10 days after elective umbilical hernia repair. He received appropriate VTE prophylaxis (mechanical and pharmacological) intraoperatively and one dose of Clexane postoperatively. The coroner found his medical care was reasonable and appropriate. A key clinical lesson concerns documentation: the VTE risk assessment was conducted but not recorded in the medication chart, creating confusion during the coronial review. This highlights the critical importance of contemporaneous documentation of all clinical decisions, particularly regarding VTE risk stratification, to ensure continuity of care and facilitate future clinical review. The case demonstrates that despite appropriate prophylaxis measures, postoperative VTE can occur; clinicians should maintain heightened clinical suspicion for DVT/PE in post-surgical patients presenting with new symptoms.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
umbilical hernia repairspigelian hernia repairlaparoscopic to open conversion
Contributing factors
Recent umbilical hernia repair surgery
Obesity
Age 74 years
Cardiac hypertrophy
Coroner's recommendations
Bass Coast Health remind staff members involved in the care of patients of the importance of completing thorough, legible and contemporaneous documentation.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.