Master T, a 17-month-old boy with chronic asthma, died from status asthmaticus on 25 November 2019. He had experienced recurrent wheezing episodes requiring multiple hospital admissions in September-October 2019. Medical management followed recognised guidelines with bronchodilators and corticosteroids. A critical system failure was identified: RCH prescribed montelukast on discharge (18 September 2019) and sent referral via fax to TNH, but the fax was incompletely received (missing cover page). TNH did not register the referral on their system, and the GP did not confirm montelukast was being administered. While the CPU concluded montelukast likely would not have changed the outcome, this communication failure represents a preventable system error. The case highlights ongoing risks with facsimile communication in healthcare despite previous coronial recommendations. Environmental smoke exposure (methamphetamine and cannabis residues detected) likely triggered asthma exacerbations.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
incomplete communication of montelukast prescription via facsimile
lack of specialist paediatric follow-up for montelukast response assessment
delayed access to home nebuliser (obtained 11 November, death 25 November)
grandfather as primary carer with limited support for medical management
Coroner's recommendations
This finding be provided to Safer Care Victoria for consideration of whether Health Services should review channels of communication in light of potential issues with facsimile as an effective form of communication in medical settings and its potential for causing harm
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.