perforated oesophagus secondary to complications of treatment of oesophageal injuries following caustic soda ingestion
AI-generated summary
Callie Griffiths-I'Anson, a 2-year-old girl, died from a perforated oesophagus secondary to complications of treatment for caustic soda ingestion. She ingested caustic dishwashing liquid at a hotel on 11 December 2017 and was transferred to the Royal Children's Hospital (RCH). On 11 January 2018, she underwent an oesophagoscopy and dilation procedure performed to standard, but suffered an iatrogenic perforation of the oesophagus during or immediately following the procedure. The perforation went undetected despite appropriate post-operative care and discharge procedures. That evening, Callie's mother called the RCH at 10pm expressing serious concerns about Callie's deterioration, but received no return call. Callie collapsed the following morning and died. The coroner found the RCH's failure to respond to the after-hours call was wholly inadequate, though causation remains unclear. Key lessons include the need for robust after-hours protocols for post-operative concerns, enhanced triaging of after-hours calls, and consideration of vulnerable regional patients.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
iatrogenic oesophageal perforation during oesophagoscopy and dilation procedure on 11 January 2018
failure to detect perforation prior to discharge
inadequate response to parental telephone call at 10pm on 11 January seeking urgent medical advice
on-call surgical registrar did not return call, believing it could wait until morning
severity of initial caustic injury and weakened oesophageal tissue
remote location of family home relative to tertiary medical care
Coroner's recommendations
The Royal Children's Hospital should consider the circumstances of Callie's death and the failure of the process for accessing advice from the on-call General Surgical Registrar about a child who had undergone a recent procedure, with a view to developing a better process.
In developing a better process, the Royal Children's Hospital should consider: (a) the qualifications of the person who takes such calls in the first instance; (b) the use of technology to re-route calls; (c) early triaging or differentiation of such calls; (d) the use of structured questioning to elicit as good clinical information as possible; (e) the particular vulnerability of children living in regional or remote areas; (f) the provision of a discharge summary and/or formal handover of the child to the nearest regional hospital for follow-up.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.