Liver failure with cirrhosis in the setting of recent paracentesis and Hepatitis C
AI-generated summary
Mr Wilson was a 43-year-old Aboriginal man with end-stage liver cirrhosis and hepatitis C who died 18 days after emergency umbilical hernia repair and one day after paracentesis drainage of 8 litres of ascites at a rural hospital. While his death was the expected outcome of terminal liver disease and medical care was reasonable, communication gaps existed. His family and Mr Wilson had disparate understandings of his prognosis—they believed he would recover and go home, while clinicians had designated him for comfort-focused terminal care with expected survival of hours to days. Mr Wilson explicitly requested family presence when dying, but this was not communicated to staff. The coroner found care appropriate but noted that explicitly conveying imminent death prognosis to Mr Wilson would have allowed him to contact family, which would have been preferable for all involved. The death certificate initially failed to record the paracentesis and incorrectly identified him as non-Aboriginal.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
gastroenterologyhepatologygeneral practicesurgeryintensive care
Error types
communication
Drugs involved
morphinesedation
Clinical conditions
liver cirrhosisend-stage liver diseasehepatitis Cascitesumbilical herniahepatic encephalopathyhyponatremiaalcohol use disorder
Procedures
umbilical hernia repairparacentesis
Contributing factors
End-stage liver disease
Hepatitis C
Alcohol use disorder preventing transplant candidacy
Hepatic encephalopathy
Recent paracentesis drainage
Recent emergency hernia repair
Communication gap regarding prognosis between clinicians and patient/family
Coroner's recommendations
Appropriately identify Mr Wilson as an Aboriginal man on his death certificate and re-register the cause of death
Explicitly convey terminal prognosis and expected timeframes to patients and families when implementing comfort-focused terminal care plans, to enable patients to contact loved ones
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.