Tracheostomy site haemorrhage in a man with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (treated)
AI-generated summary
A 50-year-old man died from tracheostomy site haemorrhage 36 days after laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer. He lived alone post-discharge with a MePACS personal alarm system and home nursing visits. When bleeding occurred at 21:49 on 3 January, he texted his wife rather than activating his alarm immediately. The alarm was activated at 00:54 on 4 January. MePACS staff attempted voice contact but Mr Locks could not respond verbally. Critical issue: MePACS did not have documented communication preferences despite knowing he was non-verbal. Staff asked open-ended questions futilely before contacting his wife and then requesting ambulance at 01:05. Paramedics arrived 1:13 but faced access delays due to a concurrent police incident. Though no delay occurred once ambulance was appropriately requested, earlier activation or streamlined non-verbal protocols might have expedited response. Hospital discharge care was appropriate; death was likely not preventable despite earlier ambulance arrival.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
ENT surgeryoncologyemergency medicineparamedicinegeneral practicespeech pathology
Error types
systemcommunication
Drugs involved
methadone
Clinical conditions
laryngeal squamous cell carcinomarecurrent squamous cell carcinomatracheostomy site haemorrhageacquired brain injuryschizophreniaattention deficit hyperactivity disordertype 2 diabetes mellitushepatitis C (treated)hepatitis Baortic valve repair status
Procedures
laryngectomyleft hemithyroidectomyleft node dissectionfree flap reconstructiontracheostomyintubation via stomamassive transfusion protocol
Contributing factors
Defect in small calibre artery (thyroid branch of left carotid artery) at tracheostomy site
Recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma post-chemoradiotherapy and laryngectomy
Delayed activation of personal alarm (patient text-messaged wife instead of activating MePACS alarm immediately despite bleeding)
Non-verbal communication status not adequately documented in MePACS file despite being known at application
Lack of documented communication preferences for non-verbal clients in MePACS protocol
Access delays due to concurrent police incident at apartment building
Patient's acquired brain injury and mental health issues affecting decision-making and communication
Coroner's recommendations
MePACS (Peninsula Health) should develop a policy and procedure specifically for non-verbal clients requiring that communication preferences and steps to be taken in medical emergency be recorded in the client's file and considered when responding to alerts
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.