Pulmonary thromboembolus secondary to deep vein thrombosis
AI-generated summary
Ronald Wood, a 68-year-old with complex medical history including prior pulmonary emboli, was treated for rectal cancer requiring chemotherapy and major surgery. Warfarin anticoagulation was appropriately ceased due to bleeding risk from the cancer and instability during chemotherapy. After surgery, he received appropriate short-term VTE prophylaxis with clexane. However, there was a critical failure to establish an ongoing anticoagulation plan post-discharge despite cumulative VTE risk factors (prior PE, cancer history, major surgery, obesity). Discharge summaries to his GP were silent on anticoagulation management. He died from pulmonary embolism 16 days post-discharge. The hospital's review identified that multiple specialists focused narrowly on their expertise without coordinating overall anticoagulation strategy. Implementation of perioperative physician overview and clear communication protocols to patients and GPs regarding anticoagulation plans could have prevented this death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
inadequate communication with general practitioner about anticoagulation plan
complex medical history with multiple VTE risk factors not synthesised into unified management plan
Coroner's recommendations
Peninsula Health expand all relevant clinical practice guidelines to require that when patients at risk of VTE are discharged from hospital, both the patient and their general practitioner receive written guidance on anticoagulation, in accordance with Quality Statements 3, 4 and 7 of the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care Clinical Care Standard on Venous Thromboembolism Prevention (October 2018)
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.