Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Cai Wheeler-Trow

Deceased

Cai Wheeler-Trow

Demographics

0y, male

Coroner

Coroner Jacqui Hawkins

Date of death

2017-11-24

Finding date

2020-07-02

Cause of death

Head injury in the setting of labour

AI-generated summary

Baby Cai Wheeler-Trow was born at 36 weeks and 2 days following a failed instrumental delivery and emergency caesarean section. He developed a skull fracture and subgaleal haemorrhage, presenting with clinical deterioration at approximately 4 hours of age. The coroner found that while Dr Mel's initial assessment was understandably difficult (subgaleal haemorrhages are rare and insidious), critical gaps existed: inadequate head circumference monitoring, inappropriate modification of vital sign thresholds on the ViCTOR chart, insufficient investigation pending PIPER arrival despite 90+ minute delay, and documentation below expected standards. The coroner could not definitively establish preventability due to extensive additional intracranial injury, but emphasized the importance of anticipating subgaleal haemorrhage risk after traumatic delivery, maintaining appropriate monitoring parameters, and ensuring prompt investigation and escalation.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

obstetricspaediatricsneonatologyretrieval medicine

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationdelaysystem

Clinical conditions

subgaleal haemorrhageskull fractureintracranial haemorrhagehypovolaemic shockcoagulopathymetabolic acidosisneonatal birth traumabrain injury

Procedures

forceps deliverycaesarean sectionintubationumbilical venous catheter insertionblood transfusion

Contributing factors

  • Failed instrumental (forceps) delivery requiring emergency caesarean section
  • Traumatic birth resulting in parietal skull fracture
  • Subgaleal haemorrhage secondary to birth trauma
  • Delay in recognition of severity of subgaleal haemorrhage
  • Inappropriate modification of ViCTOR vital sign parameters beyond guideline compliance
  • Inadequate monitoring including lack of head circumference measurements
  • Insufficient investigation pending PIPER arrival despite prolonged delay
  • Limited initial documentation by attending paediatrician
  • Delay in communication/re-contact with PIPER regarding extended arrival time
  • Extensive intracranial injury beyond subgaleal haemorrhage

Coroner's recommendations

  1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists should amend the guideline 'Prevention, detection, and management of subgaleal haemorrhage in the newborn' to include a section on the importance of assessing head circumference and scalp observations to assist identify the development of a subgaleal haemorrhage after an instrumental birth.
  2. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians should develop a guideline incorporating current knowledge from paediatric clinical practice, peer-reviewed studies such as Colditz et al, and coronial findings to assist paediatricians with identification, management and treatment of subgaleal haemorrhages in newborns.
  3. The Royal Children's Hospital PIPER service should continue to develop and implement video conferencing capability with referring hospitals to facilitate visualisation of a baby's condition and assist with assessment and management. In the interim, hospital should consider using video capacity of clinician's mobile phones, laptops and/or iPads until compatible information technology systems can be developed.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.