Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Polina Portnyagina

Deceased

POLINA PORTNYAGINA

Demographics

78y, female

Coroner

Coroner Audrey Jamieson

Date of death

2015-09-10

Finding date

2017-06-29

Cause of death

Complications of a left tentorial meningioma

AI-generated summary

A 78-year-old woman with a meningioma detected incidentally on MRI in 2009 presented to hospital in 2015 with gait disturbance and falls. The tumour had grown significantly, causing hydrocephalus and mass effect. After appropriate informed consent discussions with neurosurgical staff using an interpreter, she elected to undergo surgery. She died suddenly on 10 September 2015 from complications of the meningioma (intratumoral haemorrhage and herniation) before surgery could be performed. The coroner found neurosurgical management appropriate but identified that the 2009 imaging report recommending no follow-up represented a missed opportunity for surveillance of tumour growth. Key lesson: incidental meningiomas warrant follow-up recommendations; radiologists should specify appropriate surveillance strategies rather than omitting follow-up advice.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

neurosurgeryradiologyneurology

Error types

diagnosticsystem

Drugs involved

dexamethasonelevetiracetampantoprazoleaspirin

Clinical conditions

meningiomatentorial meningiomahydrocephalusintratumoral haemorrhagecerebellar tonsillar herniationsubdural haemorrhagehyponatraemiahypertension

Contributing factors

  • Meningioma detected in 2009 with no follow-up recommendations
  • Tumour growth over six years without surveillance imaging
  • Intratumoral haemorrhage causing secondary mass effects and herniation
  • Lack of radiology guidelines for reporting incidental meningiomas

Coroner's recommendations

  1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists should develop guidelines requiring radiologists reporting incidental meningiomas to make specific recommendations to referring doctors regarding appropriate follow-up, such as surveillance imaging or neurosurgical review
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.