Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Leroy William Scott

Deceased

Leroy William Scott

Demographics

1y, male

Coroner

Coroner Jacinta Heffey

Date of death

2011-04-26

Finding date

2014-12-04

Cause of death

Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia of unknown origin

AI-generated summary

Leroy William Scott, a 15-month-old boy, presented to Geelong Hospital with fever, lethargy, and poor oral intake. He was triaged as semi-urgent and not seen by a doctor until 5 AM, 8 hours later. Blood cultures drawn at 5:50 AM showed positive growth (Staphylococcus aureus) by 8 PM Sunday, with gram-positive cocci confirmed Monday morning. Despite an elevated CRP of 103.7, fever, and preliminary blood culture results, Dr Fuller did not commence empirical antibiotics when reviewing Leroy Monday morning. By Tuesday 5 AM, Leroy developed a purpuric rash and shock. He was transferred to ICU but arrested at 10.12 AM and died. The coroner found that earlier empirical antibiotics would very likely have saved his life. Key clinical failures included: inadequate triage (Category 4), 8-hour delay to first doctor review, failure to act on preliminary positive blood culture and elevated CRP, failure to repeat CRP or enquire about time-to-positivity, and laboratory delays in setup and reporting of confirmatory coagulase testing. This death was preventable with better communication between pathology and clinical teams, and escalation based on objective markers of bacterial infection despite clinically reassuring features.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

paediatricsemergency medicineinfectious diseasesmicrobiologyintensive care

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationdelaysystem

Drugs involved

paracetamolibuprofencefotaximesalbutamol

Clinical conditions

sepsisseptic shockStaphylococcus aureus bacteraemiafever of unknown originviral illness (initial misdiagnosis)purpuric rashpetechaedehydration

Procedures

blood culture collectionintravenous cannulationnasogastric tube insertionchest X-rayabdominal X-ray

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate triage (Category 4 assigned despite fever 38.1°C and lethargy)
  • Eight-hour delay from presentation to first medical review
  • Failure to act on preliminary positive blood culture result (gram-positive cocci)
  • Failure to act on elevated CRP result (103.7)
  • Failure to repeat CRP testing to reassess clinical trajectory
  • Failure to enquire about time-to-positivity of blood culture (9 hours 41 minutes - highly suggestive of true pathogen)
  • Failure to commence empirical antibiotics despite unresolved blood culture results and objective markers of infection
  • Laboratory delay in commencing coagulase test (4 hours after gram-stain result available)
  • Laboratory failure to read coagulase test results at 2-hour and 4-hour intervals before staff departure
  • Poor communication between pathology and clinical teams regarding test status and availability
  • Inadequate handover of information regarding blood culture results between Dr Athan (infectious diseases) and treating paediatric team
  • Misunderstanding regarding laboratory hours of operation on public holidays

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Clearer protocols between hospital and pathology regarding hours of operation on public holidays/weekends
  2. Clearer protocols providing on-call scientist name and contact details for urgent blood results on evenings, weekends, and public holidays
  3. St John of God Pathology should inform Barwon Health via on-call physician if coagulase test commences less than 2 hours before staff departure, enabling decision on whether on-call scientist needed
  4. Same notification protocol if 2-hour result known but laboratory closing before 4-hour result due
  5. On-call physician to relay such information to treating team
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.