Ruptured splenic artery aneurysm with extensive retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal haemorrhage
AI-generated summary
Michelle Johnson, a 31-year-old pregnant woman at 32 weeks gestation, presented to the Royal Women's Hospital with sudden-onset severe left-sided abdominal pain and hypotension on 21 March 2010. She was assessed by registrar Dr F. and covering specialist Dr L., with initial low blood pressure attributed to musculoskeletal pain from dancing. Investigations were unremarkable. After discharge that evening, she collapsed the following morning and was found to have a ruptured splenic artery aneurysm, a rare but recognised pregnancy complication. The coroner found her initial assessment was appropriate and no failure to diagnose represents medical deficiency, given the condition's extreme rarity. However, communication breakdowns occurred between hospital staff and the private obstetrician. The key clinical lesson is that intra-abdominal haemorrhage must be considered in differential diagnosis when pregnant women present with severe abdominal pain requiring narcotic analgesia.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Rare splenic artery aneurysm associated with pregnancy
Initial presentation symptoms (abdominal pain, hypotension) were premonitory/leak phase, with subsequent acute rupture 20-30 hours later
Communication breakdown between hospital registrar and covering obstetrician
Failure of covering obstetrician to review patient on ward as planned
Patient discharged before being reviewed by covering specialist
Coroner's recommendations
Intra-abdominal haemorrhage (e.g. ruptured splenic artery aneurysm, ruptured liver) should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis when a pregnant woman presents with severe abdominal pain especially if she requires narcotic analgesia
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.