Complications of bowel surgery; specifically post-operative chest infection and sepsis progressing to multi-organ failure, consistent with overwhelming post-splenectomy infection
AI-generated summary
Barry Howroyd, a 78-year-old man, underwent routine colonoscopy on 7 August 2008 which complicated a known bowel carcinoma diagnosis. The procedure caused bowel perforation, diagnosed the next day via CT imaging. Surgical repair proceeded on 9 August with right hemicolectomy. Post-operatively, he developed chest infection on day 4, progressing to sepsis and multi-organ failure. Death resulted from post-operative complications including overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI) in a patient with recurrent MALT lymphoma predisposing to infection. Critical clinical lessons: (1) his initial ED presentation on 7 August was not triaged or recorded despite describing concerning symptoms; (2) communication between referring doctor and imaging centre regarding suspected perforation was not optimally conveyed; (3) the six-hour delay in re-presenting to hospital on 8 August resulted from inadequate urgency communication by the treating physician. While delays did not ultimately cause death, they exemplified systemic ED dysfunction. Improvements to ED processes including dedicated triage registration, waiting room monitoring, and enhanced staffing were subsequently implemented.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
gastroenterologygeneral surgeryanaesthesiaradiologyintensive careemergency medicine
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.