Coronial
SAhome

Coroner's Finding: Rigney, Amber Rose and Mitchell, Korey Lee

Deceased

Amber Rose Rigney and Korey Lee Mitchell

Demographics

unknown

Date of death

2016-05-30

Finding date

2022-04-21

Cause of death

Amber Rose Rigney: external airway occlusion with compression of the neck; Korey Lee Mitchell: compression of the neck

AI-generated summary

Two children, Amber Rose Rigney (6) and Korey Lee Mitchell (5), were murdered on 30 May 2016 by their mother's partner Steven Graham Peet. The Coroner found their deaths were preventable. The children's mother had been using ice (methamphetamine) and cannabis, leaving children without adequate food or care. Families SA received multiple notifications from 2015-2016 detailing concerns: Amber's severe school absenteeism (106 days absent in one year), mother's daily ice use and dealing, children left with near-strangers, family homelessness, and malnutrition. Despite these notifications meeting statutory thresholds for intervention under the Children's Protection Act 1993 (sections 19 and 20), the Department closed most matters using 'Notifier Only Concern' or 'Closed No Action' procedures citing resource constraints. The Department failed to investigate, consult with paternal grandparents willing to care for the children, involve police, or apply for court-ordered drug assessment. Previous coronial findings in Chloe Valentine and Ebony Napier cases had explicitly criticized identical failures regarding section 20(2) obligations. This represented egregious institutional non-compliance with mandatory statutory duties.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Systemic failure of child protection authority to comply with mandatory statutory obligations
  • Repeated failure to investigate notifications meeting statutory risk thresholds
  • Use of 'Notifier Only Concern' (NOC) procedure to close notifications inappropriately
  • Use of 'Closed No Action' (CNA) procedure due to alleged resource constraints despite statutory obligations
  • Failure to escalate Tier 2 notifications to Tier 1 despite clear indicators of imminent danger
  • Failure to apply for court-ordered drug assessment under section 20(2) of Children's Protection Act despite repeated credible notifications of mother's illicit drug abuse
  • Failure to investigate school truancy despite child being persistently absent (statutory indicator of risk)
  • Failure to investigate family homelessness despite child having no fixed address (statutory indicator of risk)
  • Failure to involve police in investigation of alleged drug dealing and use
  • Failure to communicate with paternal grandparents who expressed willingness to care for children
  • Failure to intervene in Federal Circuit Court proceedings despite court requests and expressed concerns
  • Resource constraints within Elizabeth office of Families SA cited as justification for inaction, though Gawler office had capacity
  • Delayed processing of email notifications (eCARL) not assessed for days or weeks
  • Disregarding of previous coronial findings in Valentine and Napier inquests regarding identical failures
  • Non-adherence to Chief Executive directive following Valentine finding requiring strict compliance with section 20(2)
  • Inadequate assessment of cumulative harm and historical context of mother's violence toward child S
  • Mother's physical violence toward previous partner and alcohol/drug use while intoxicated in presence of children
  • Mother's poor parenting capacity and lack of engagement with child protection services
  • General dysfunction and neglect within family environment

Coroner's recommendations

  1. A comprehensive review of all coronial and other recommendations (including from Ombudsman and Royal Commission) relating to child protection in South Australia, with a view to implementation
  2. A complete review of all statutory obligations contained within the Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017 to ensure Department practices align with obligations
  3. Examination of all documented and undocumented internal Departmental procedures to ensure compliance with statutory obligations
  4. Assessment and full resourcing of all statutory obligations under the Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017 to enable duties and obligations to be carried out without exception
  5. Reminder to all Department staff of the need to consider engaging police powers pursuant to the Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017, particularly where allegations involve illicit drug abuse placing a child at risk
  6. Agreement with recommendations made by the South Australian Ombudsman regarding information sharing and disclosure where necessary to prevent serious risk to health and safety of a person
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —