Coronial
QLDhome

Inquest into the deaths of F and M

Deceased

F and M

Demographics

33y, male

Coroner

Kirkegaard

Date of death

2022-03-10

Finding date

2026-04-21

Cause of death

Extensive burns sustained when former partner deliberately splashed petrol on him while sleeping and threw a Molotov cocktail, setting him alight from head to toe.

AI-generated summary

F and M, two parents involved in family law proceedings over their three children, both died in a house fire in March 2022. F (aged 33) died from extensive burns after M (aged 31) deliberately splashed him with petrol and threw a Molotov cocktail while he slept. M died from smoke inhalation. The children were placed in F's care by interim consent order the previous day after psychiatric assessment diagnosed M with borderline personality disorder and chronic PTSD, identifying her as posing significant risk of lethal violence to herself and children. Critical clinical lessons include: early identification of perpetrator-victim dynamics in domestic violence cases, particularly recognising non-physical forms of coercive control and systems abuse; explicit assessment of risk to receiving parent when children transition care; need for mental health specialist involvement in safety planning; importance of multi-agency information sharing to prevent gender bias in risk assessment; and the danger of failing to identify risk of intimate partner homicide when mental illness and family law proceedings converge.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatrypaediatricspsychology

Error types

diagnosticsystemcommunicationdelay

Clinical conditions

borderline personality disorderchronic post-traumatic stress disorderanxietydepressionmental health crisisintimate partner homicidefilicidefamilicide

Contributing factors

  • Failure to assess and identify risk to receiving parent (F) after custody transfer
  • Gender-biased risk assessment by multiple agencies misidentifying perpetrator-victim dynamics
  • Inadequate safety planning at point of custody handover
  • Failure to provide explicit risk assessment and safety planning for receiving parent and children
  • Mental health assessment identified lethal violence risk to children but not to ex-partner
  • Narrow focus on managing risk during report release rather than after custody transition
  • Lack of coordination between legal practitioners regarding risk to F after children placed in his care
  • Unrecognised systems abuse (pattern of false allegations) by M against F
  • M's unsubstantiated allegations not linked to domestic violence perpetration by M
  • No discussion between legal counsel and F regarding safety precautions after custody order
  • Court-ordered custody transition as acute trigger event for individual with borderline personality disorder and persecutory beliefs

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Commonwealth Attorney-General to consider amendments to Family Law Act confidentiality provisions (ss 10Q-10W) to facilitate provision of information regarding participation in family safety risk screening or risk assessment/safety planning for purpose of examination of domestic and family violence related deaths or to domestic and family violence death review bodies.
  2. Legal practitioners in parenting proceedings where radical change of residence is expected based on risk should maintain expansive consideration of risk of harm to receiving parent, particularly lethal violence, where: relinquishing parent has personality vulnerabilities predisposing acute crisis reactions; unsubstantiated persecutory beliefs about receiving parent; or receiving parent has alleged domestic violence or expressed fear of relinquishing parent.
  3. Independent Children's Lawyers should seek specialist family violence assessment input (in addition to mental health assessment) to better understand and assess risk of harm to others in children's support network.
  4. Family law practitioners should develop frank discussions with receiving parent about identified risks of harm to them with children in their care, escalate safety concerns, and develop comprehensive safety plans for handover and beyond.
  5. Exploration by Chief Justice of extending Court Children's Service psychological and social work resources to support relinquishing parent when suppressed adverse mental health report is released in Court with likely outcome of immediate child custody transition.
  6. Independent Children's Lawyers should proactively engage with co-located Child Safety officers from outset of ICL appointment in parenting proceedings where concurrent Child Safety involvement exists, to identify when specialist family violence input may be needed.
  7. FCFCOA and Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety to continue collaborative examination of opportunities to enhance information sharing protocol and program resourcing for earlier and faster exchange of information about active Child Safety involvement with families whose children are subject of parenting proceedings, including: operational requirement for Child Safety Officers to notify co-located team when assessment underway for children subject to family law proceedings; Child Safety to receive copies of FCFCOA orders as made; routine linking of Child Safety Officers in assessments with appointed ICLs; faster information exchange mechanisms without requiring court events.
  8. Queensland Law Society to continue providing continuing professional development in domestic and family violence and coercive impact of family law proceedings on clients, with consideration of support services for solicitors managing clients with complex mental health vulnerabilities.
  9. Development of training for FCFCOA judicial officers and staff on risk factors associated with domestic and family violence homicide, infanticide and filicide, and intersection of family violence with mental health issues and substance misuse.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.