Thompson James Harvey, aged 33, died by hanging in his cell at Capricornia Correctional Centre on 13 November 2017, four days after remand for serious offences including attempted murder. He had a recent suicide attempt by gunshot wound (31 October), was on opiate medications for withdrawal management, and presented with anxiety and withdrawal symptoms. Initially assessed as medium risk with 60-minute observations, his risk was downgraded to low with 120-minute observations after two days based on self-reported improvement and reconciliation with partner. Key clinical lessons: risk assessments relied heavily on prisoner self-reporting without adequate collateral verification; protective factors were poorly documented; morphine withdrawal management was unclear and inadequately communicated between hospital and prison; observations on the final morning were missed due to shift handover gaps; and suicide risk assessment cannot rely solely on self-report in recently suicidal patients with poly-substance abuse and relationship breakdown.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
psychiatrypsychologyemergency medicinecorrectional healthintensive care
Unclear rationale for discontinuation of suicide-resistant bedding and clothing after risk downgrade
Coroner's recommendations
Cease use of standard, automated or pre-populated wording in prisoner risk assessments and list specific risk and protective factors
Professional psychological staff expressly disclose reasoning supporting recommendations specific to individual prisoners
Amend risk guidelines so that if protective factors cannot be discussed or are insufficient, prisoners cannot be assessed lower than high risk level (15-30 minute observations)
Develop training package for Correctional Supervisors conducting at-risk assessments including collateral checking
Remind staff to undertake collateral checks to verify validity and accuracy of prisoner self-reports
RAT members consider and verify appropriateness of at-risk prisoner accommodation and express this consideration in At-Risk Management Plans
Clarify COPD regarding 'reduced hanging points' and assess whether secure accommodation meets this requirement
Ensure ARMP not implemented until ratification process completed by Deputy General Manager
RAT Meeting Minutes prepared after meeting to allow full recording of reasoning
Even if assessed as low risk, expressly consider whether prisoner should be subject to suicide-resistant clothing/bedding with documented reasoning
Cease local practice of one person sighting prisoner and another signing observation log; officer who sights prisoner should sign log
Review shift handover procedures to ensure observations between 06:00-07:00 are expressly allocated to relevant supervisor
Psychologists record sufficient detail supporting reasoning for cancelling safety orders in both IOMS and RAT minutes
All staff reminded to raise SHEH flag and enter sufficient information in accordance with COPD
Officers give due consideration to all available information and correlate with prisoner self-reporting; seek collateral information and verification
Investigate feasibility of safer cells and 'safe cell' design infrastructure with reduced hanging points, particularly intercom boxes
Publish annual updates on implementation of safer cells strategy and progress against that strategy
All Correctional Officers receive additional training on responsibilities for management of incidents including apparent good health checks
Staff reminded of responsibility to immediately alleviate pressure on prisoner's neck during response to hanging
All CCC staff undergo further training on life-saving measures in circumstances involving possible death in custody and medical emergencies
Staff trained on requirements for first aid and commencement and continuation of life-saving measures
Complete Death in Custody Management Checklist and conduct Level 2 operational debrief following incidents
Amend COPD to require Form 193 Debrief Workshop be used as reference for future incident debriefs
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.