Coronial
SAhospital

Coroner's Finding: VELT Hank Jakob

Deceased

Hank Jakob Velt

Demographics

65y, male

Date of death

2016-05-06

Finding date

2020-10-30

Cause of death

ischaemic and hypertensive heart disease with contributing acute cholecystitis (operated)

AI-generated summary

A 65-year-old man with hypertension presented with acute cholecystitis, underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and initially recovered well. On post-operative day 7, he experienced chest pain radiating to his jaw. Two ECGs were performed, both showing acute inferior myocardial infarction with ST elevation. The automated ECG interpretations stated 'Acute MI' and 'Inferior infarct, acute'. The nursing staff incorrectly believed the machine interpretations were unreliable and attempted to interpret the traces themselves. They failed to make a MET call and instead called an on-call doctor who did not ask what the ECG said and expected to review it by fax. The fax transmission failed due to technical issues. Mr Velt was left alone with a student nurse despite the nurses' awareness of possible MI. He suffered an unwitnessed cardiac arrest and died. Expert evidence confirmed timely medical intervention with defibrillation equipment would likely have saved his life.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

general surgerycardiologyintensive caregeneral medicine

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

acute myocardial infarctioninferior myocardial infarctionST elevationventricular fibrillationmyocardial ischaemiacoronary artery stenosisacute cholecystitishypertensionpost-operative infection

Procedures

laparoscopic cholecystectomyelectrocardiogramintraoperative cholangiogramgallstone retrievalcardiopulmonary resuscitation

Contributing factors

  • failure to recognise significance of acute MI on ECG
  • failure to make MET call despite clear ECG findings
  • inadequate nurse training on ECG interpretation and risk response
  • inadequate hospital policies for managing chest pain in non-cardiac wards
  • failure of on-call doctor to ask what ECG interpretation stated
  • failure of ECG fax transmission
  • patient left unattended despite suspected MI
  • absence of cardiac monitoring in general ward
  • poor communication between nursing staff and medical officers

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Amend Medical Emergency Team Calling Criteria to divide 'New or unrelieved chest pain' into two criteria: 'New chest pain (whether or not relieved)' and 'Unrelieved chest pain'
  2. Add criterion 'An ECG taken in the absence of a doctor asserts, in the written interpretation, heart attack, infarct or myocardial infarction, or ST elevation' to MET calling criteria
  3. If full implementation of above recommendations not achieved, develop and implement a Chest Pain Policy for nurses caring for patients not subject to cardiac monitoring including: immediate notification of medical officer, continuous observation, defibrillator availability, ECG conduct, staff training, and policy monitoring
  4. Implement programmed training or refresher training of clinical staff in management of clinical risks
  5. Review policies and procedures relating to student nurses to ensure appropriate supervision and prevent them bearing responsibility for clinical tasks or decision-making
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.