ruptured splenic artery aneurysm with haemorrhage and internal blood loss
AI-generated summary
A 25-year-old pregnant woman (23 weeks) presented to hospital with sudden left upper quadrant abdominal pain and loss of consciousness. Clinical assessment identified renal colic and gallstones as likely diagnoses. She remained stable overnight but experienced recurrent severe pain at 3am and ultimate catastrophic collapse at 10:45am due to a ruptured splenic artery aneurysm. The diagnosis was only suspected when she was in extremis and could not be confirmed until autopsy. Key clinical lessons: (1) ruptured splenic artery aneurysm must be considered in pregnant women with sudden severe left upper abdominal pain regardless of initial stability; (2) consultant involvement was absent until final collapse; (3) a planned ultrasound examination was not carried out despite clinical deterioration; (4) the 'double rupture phenomenon' with initial contained bleeding followed by stability is characteristic and should not provide false reassurance; (5) lack of shock, guarding, or rigidity does not exclude serious intra-abdominal bleeding; (6) a previous similar death at the same hospital (Hooper case, 2009) had generated no formal recommendations or sustained educational initiatives.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
obstetricsemergency medicineradiologyanaesthesiageneral surgery
failure to diagnose ruptured splenic artery aneurysm prior to catastrophic rupture
lack of consultant involvement until patient was in extremis
inadequate knowledge of ruptured splenic artery aneurysm among clinical staff
planned ultrasound examination not carried out (misplaced request form and lack of clinical urgency)
false reassurance from period of haemodynamic stability following initial bleed
focus on alternative diagnoses (renal colic, gallstones) without adequate urgency to exclude life-threatening causes
cardiac arrest during induction of anaesthesia due to severe hypovolaemia at time of surgery
delayed diagnosis preventing earlier, less complicated surgical intervention
Coroner's recommendations
Educational and professional development strategies be directed to the medical profession, including practitioners and nursing/midwifery staff, concerning ruptured splenic artery aneurysm, specifically addressing: (a) that diagnosis should be considered in any pregnant patient with sudden onset severe left upper-abdominal pain regardless of shock status; (b) symptomatology of the condition; (c) that patients may not present in shock initially; (d) risk of false reassurance from haemodynamic stability; (e) limited reassurance from response to analgesia; (f) diagnostic significance of absence of guarding and rigidity; (g) available diagnostic measures; (h) need for urgency in diagnostic measures when this diagnosis is considered
Presentations of pregnant women with sudden onset severe left upper abdominal pain, especially with loss of consciousness, should be immediately referred to a consultant obstetrician/gynaecologist or other consultant-level practitioner
Such patients should be subject to continual detailed observation supervised by a consultant-level medical practitioner
Endorsement of Victorian Coroner's recommendation that intra-abdominal haemorrhage (e.g. ruptured splenic artery aneurysm, ruptured liver) should be considered in differential diagnosis when pregnant woman presents with severe abdominal pain, especially if requiring narcotic analgesia
Consultations between consultant medical practitioners and radiologists regarding appropriateness of CT scans in pregnant women where ruptured splenic artery aneurysm is in differential diagnosis should occur routinely
Where ruptured splenic artery aneurysm is in differential diagnosis but other diagnoses need exploration, all diagnostic measures for those other diagnoses should be conducted urgently at first available opportunity
Services at Women's and Children's Hospital should be co-located with Royal Adelaide Hospital
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.