A 25-year-old pregnant woman (23 weeks gestation) presenting with collapse and severe abdominal pain was not definitively diagnosed with a ruptured splenic artery aneurysm despite examination by multiple medical practitioners. Emergency surgery was performed but failed to identify the rupture. The death was only confirmed as aneurysm rupture at autopsy. A prior similar death from the same condition (Monique Hooper, 2009) had occurred at the same hospital but lessons learned remain unclear. The coroner examined whether quality improvement activities and recommendations following the earlier death had been conducted and whether these could have prevented this death. The ruling addresses legal questions about disclosure of protected quality improvement documentation under South Australian health legislation rather than clinical findings on causation of death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
no definitive diagnosis made before emergency surgery
rupture not identified during emergency surgical intervention
absence of diagnostic imaging or appropriate investigations to identify the condition
rare and difficult-to-diagnose pathological condition
lack of consultation with senior/specialist staff
possible failure to learn from prior death of Monique Hooper from identical cause in 2009
Coroner's recommendations
The coroner's ruling requires the Chief Executive of SA Health to produce documentation sought by summons, including any materials received, created or possessed by the Maternal, Perinatal and Infant Mortality Committee relating to the death of Monique Hooper and any recommendations made following review of that death.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.