Coroner's Finding: Chadha, Hemant and Battagodage, Sachintha Nandula
Deceased
Hemant Chadha and Sachintha Nandula Battagodage
Demographics
male
Date of death
2020-04-23
Finding date
2026-03-30
Cause of death
Hemant Chadha: acute on chronic pneumonia (mycoplasma pneumoniae). Sachintha Battagodage: acute haemothorax due to ruptured pseudoaneurysm of right subclavian artery
AI-generated summary
Two young men died after repeated ED presentations were not appropriately managed. Hemant Chadha (38) died of acute pneumonia complicated by possible neurological involvement after being discharged from Lyell McEwin Hospital despite three ED presentations within 4 days and concerning new symptoms (numbness, tingling). Ambulance officers treated him dismissively, undermining his confidence in the health system and contributing to his refusal to call for help when critically ill. Sachintha Battagodage (23) died of rupture of a pseudoaneurysm of the right subclavian artery after haemoptysis was underappreciated at RAH. On first presentation, no chest x-ray was performed despite haemoptysis in a young previously well patient. On re-presentation with moderate-to-frank haemoptysis, he was again discharged without admission despite abnormal imaging, partly due to language barriers and failure to review video evidence. Both deaths were preventable with appropriate senior review of repeat presentations, thorough assessment of concerning symptoms, and proper investigation.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- failure to admit patient despite third ED presentation within 4 days with same complaint
- failure to appropriately investigate new neurological symptoms (numbness, tingling, weakness)
- misattribution of symptoms to anxiety without adequate investigation
- use of pejorative language by paramedics ('man flu', 'drama', 'acopia') that undermined patient confidence
- disrespectful conduct by paramedics toward patient and family
- failure to appreciate significance of haemoptysis in young previously well patient
- failure to order chest x-ray despite haemoptysis
- failure to obtain accurate history of haemoptysis from non-English speaking patient
- failure to review video evidence of haemoptysis provided by patient
- failure to recognise urgency of findings on imaging
- discharge of patient with unexplained mass and active haemoptysis without senior review
- failure to admit patient on re-presentation despite worsening symptoms
- language barrier not adequately addressed with interpreter
- COVID-19 pandemic contributing to reduced admission threshold and inability of family to attend as advocate
Coroner's recommendations
- Hospital Admission through NALHN ED Procedure be reviewed to require ED Consultants have authority to admit patients who re-present with same symptoms within 72 hours
- Patients re-presenting within 72 hours must not be discharged without review by senior decision-maker (consultant or senior registrar)
- Patients re-presenting and referred for admission must not be discharged until documented consultation occurs with referring clinician
- Procedure allowing referring clinician to formally challenge discharge decision
- Amended procedure to be audited 12-monthly for compliance
- All clinicians with admission/discharge authority to be advised in writing and sign confirmation of understanding
- Uniform procedure across all Local Health Networks for repeat ED presentations within 72 hours
- SAAS discontinue use of term 'acopia' in all communications
- Implementation of inclusive language program by SAAS
- Audit of SAAS complaint policy compliance
- Development of means to incorporate photographs and videos into patient electronic medical records
- Copy of Local Team-Based Review Report provided to all staff involved in incident
- Staff receiving recommendations to be appropriately advised of findings and given opportunity to respond
- Monitoring of recommendations to ensure appropriate action taken
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —