Coroner's Finding: Chadha, Hemant and Battagodage, Sachintha Nandula
Deceased
Hemant Chadha and Sachintha Nandula Battagodage
Demographics
male
Date of death
2020-04-23 and 2020-11-23
Finding date
2026-03-30
Cause of death
Hemant Chadha: acute on chronic pneumonia (mycoplasma pneumoniae). Sachintha Battagodage: acute haemothorax due to ruptured pseudoaneurysm of right subclavian artery
AI-generated summary
Two young men died after repeated ED presentations were not appropriately managed. Hemant Chadha (38) died of acute pneumonia complicated by possible neurological involvement after being discharged from Lyell McEwin Hospital despite three ED presentations within 4 days and concerning new symptoms (numbness, tingling). Ambulance officers treated him dismissively, undermining his confidence in the health system and contributing to his refusal to call for help when critically ill. Sachintha Battagodage (23) died of rupture of a pseudoaneurysm of the right subclavian artery after haemoptysis was underappreciated at RAH. On first presentation, no chest x-ray was performed despite haemoptysis in a young previously well patient. On re-presentation with moderate-to-frank haemoptysis, he was again discharged without admission despite abnormal imaging, partly due to language barriers and failure to review video evidence. Both deaths were preventable with appropriate senior review of repeat presentations, thorough assessment of concerning symptoms, and proper investigation.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
emergency medicinegeneral practiceparamedicinerespiratory medicinecardiothoracic surgeryradiologygeneral medicine
failure to admit patient despite third ED presentation within 4 days with same complaint
failure to appropriately investigate new neurological symptoms (numbness, tingling, weakness)
misattribution of symptoms to anxiety without adequate investigation
use of pejorative language by paramedics ('man flu', 'drama', 'acopia') that undermined patient confidence
disrespectful conduct by paramedics toward patient and family
failure to appreciate significance of haemoptysis in young previously well patient
failure to order chest x-ray despite haemoptysis
failure to obtain accurate history of haemoptysis from non-English speaking patient
failure to review video evidence of haemoptysis provided by patient
failure to recognise urgency of findings on imaging
discharge of patient with unexplained mass and active haemoptysis without senior review
failure to admit patient on re-presentation despite worsening symptoms
language barrier not adequately addressed with interpreter
COVID-19 pandemic contributing to reduced admission threshold and inability of family to attend as advocate
Coroner's recommendations
Hospital Admission through NALHN ED Procedure be reviewed to require ED Consultants have authority to admit patients who re-present with same symptoms within 72 hours
Patients re-presenting within 72 hours must not be discharged without review by senior decision-maker (consultant or senior registrar)
Patients re-presenting and referred for admission must not be discharged until documented consultation occurs with referring clinician
Procedure allowing referring clinician to formally challenge discharge decision
Amended procedure to be audited 12-monthly for compliance
All clinicians with admission/discharge authority to be advised in writing and sign confirmation of understanding
Uniform procedure across all Local Health Networks for repeat ED presentations within 72 hours
SAAS discontinue use of term 'acopia' in all communications
Implementation of inclusive language program by SAAS
Audit of SAAS complaint policy compliance
Development of means to incorporate photographs and videos into patient electronic medical records
Copy of Local Team-Based Review Report provided to all staff involved in incident
Staff receiving recommendations to be appropriately advised of findings and given opportunity to respond
Monitoring of recommendations to ensure appropriate action taken
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.