delirium due to aspiration pneumonia complicating advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (stage 4)
AI-generated summary
A 79-year-old man with metastatic lung cancer suffered multiple strokes causing confusion and behavioural disturbance. He was detained under Mental Health Act. On the night shift, nursing staff found him unresponsive and pulseless but failed to call a Code Blue or commence resuscitation despite a documented full resuscitation order. The on-call doctor appropriately instructed Code Blue activation when reached, but the patient was already deceased for several minutes. The coroner found the failure to call Code Blue breached hospital protocol but made no difference to outcome, as the patient was irreversibly dead when discovered. Key lessons include ensuring clear communication between nursing staff during acute deterioration, adhering to resuscitation protocols regardless of perceived prognosis, and seeking senior guidance promptly when uncertain.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
oncologygeriatric medicinepsychiatryneurology
Error types
communicationsystem
Clinical conditions
metastatic non-small cell lung cancer stage 4embolic strokeaspiration pneumoniadeliriumagitation
Contributing factors
multiple embolic strokes in posterior circulation of brain
confusion and behavioural disturbance secondary to strokes
failure to call Code Blue as per hospital protocol
failure to commence resuscitation despite documented full resuscitation order
communication breakdown between nursing staff and on-call doctor
uncertainty and shock in nursing response to acute deterioration
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.