Coroner's Finding: Sears, James Frank
Deceased
James Frank Sears
Demographics
53y, male
Date of death
2021-03-01
Finding date
2025-06-03
Cause of death
disseminated malignant melanoma
AI-generated summary
A 53-year-old man died of disseminated malignant melanoma while incarcerated at Yatala Labour Prison. Initial excision of a large arm mole in November 2019 revealed Stage III melanoma. A January 2020 multi-disciplinary team meeting recommended wide local excision and lymph node dissection, but this critical surgery was never performed due to communication breakdown between dermatology and surgical oncology. By May 2020, extensive metastatic disease had developed. The coroner found that had the recommended surgery occurred as planned, the patient had a 65% chance of five-year disease-free survival. The standard of care was unsatisfactory; systemic failures in MDT communication and follow-up directly contributed to a preventable death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- failure to action multi-disciplinary team recommendations for wide local excision and lymph node dissection in January 2020
- communication breakdown between RAH dermatology and surgical oncology departments
- lack of systemic follow-up mechanism to ensure MDT recommendations were implemented
- delay in treatment resulting in progression from Stage III to extensive metastatic disease by May 2020
- absence of clear booking and appointment system following MDT meeting
Coroner's recommendations
- MDT meeting processes be reviewed and a clear system established for documenting, communicating, and following up upon Multi-Disciplinary Team recommendations across SA Health
- Recommendations following RAH MDT are clearly recorded
- Clinical Summary of MDT including recommendations is sent to referring clinician with copies to other relevant clinicians
- General practitioner or primary care doctor (including prison doctors) should receive copy of MDT summary; recommendations should be clearly labeled as advisory
- MDT Clinical Summary filed in patient's clinical records in easily locatable location in main EMR system
- MDT Chair checks that appointment has been made in respective clinic for next stage of management
- MDT Chair follows up when patient is listed for discussion, with alert on EMR system especially where actions are required
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —