In the matter of three deaths of AFP appointees in the Australian Capital TerritoryInquest into the Death of Richard RobertsInquest into the Death of Samantha BaglinInquest into the Death of Dominic Coleman
Deceased
Richard Roberts, Samantha Baglin, Dominic Coleman
Demographics
unknown
Date of death
2018-10-28, 2018-12-09, 2019-07-02
Finding date
2023-10-04
Cause of death
Self-inflicted gunshot wound; suicide
AI-generated summary
Three Australian Federal Police (AFP) appointees died by suicide using AFP-issued firearms: Richard Roberts (57, PSO), Samantha Baglin (44), and Dominic Coleman (52, ASO). All three had untreated mental health conditions and avoided disclosure through the required Change of Health Notification Form (COHNF). The coroner identified systemic vulnerabilities in AFP firearms governance. The COHNF system placed responsibility entirely on employees to self-report, with ambiguous criteria for mental health issues. None submitted required disclosures because of workplace stigma and confidentiality concerns. Physical access controls were inadequate: two accessed armouries via security pass during leave; one retained a firearm as an ASO without standardised storage procedures. Key lessons include: clarify COHNF requirements to mandate reporting of any mental health treatment; temporarily remove firearms during leave; implement supervised armoury access; increase mental health clinician security clearances; and integrate mental health reviews into operational safety frameworks.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- untreated mental illness at time of death
- inadequate Change of Health Notification Form (COHNF) system
- workplace stigma preventing disclosure of mental health issues
- ambiguous COHNF criteria not explicitly requiring mental health disclosure
- lack of mandatory psychological assessment in operational safety qualification process
- inadequate armoury access controls outside core business hours
- inadequate standardised procedures for Air Security Officer firearm storage
- absence of temporary firearms access removal during periods of leave
- lack of mental health screening integration with firearm access decisions
- poor integration and resourcing of mental health support services
- AFP mental health clinicians lacked appropriate security clearances
Coroner's recommendations
- The AFP should simplify COHNF submission requirements to remove ambiguity, mandating submission whenever an AFP appointee is diagnosed with or treated for mental health conditions, rather than requiring judgment about whether submission is required.
- The AFP should amend CO3 to explicitly reference the requirement to submit a COHNF, the ability of AFP Chief Medical Officer or Principal Psychologist or manager to direct submission, and the obligation to participate in regular mental health review processes as part of the framework for safe use of force.
- The AFP should incorporate into CO3 provision for temporary removal of access to AFP equipment, including firearms, for periods when an appointee will not or should not be required to use it, such as approved leave periods.
- The AFP should consider ways to use existing paid leave entitlements to allow supervisors or managers to require appointees not to attend work due to concerns about wellbeing or fitness for work, without stigma.
- The AFP should progress its review of viability of increasing security clearance levels for a significant percentage of mental health clinicians and contracted psychologists to enable discussion of classified or sensitive material affecting treatment.
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —