A 2-year-old boy, Kaled Kanj, drowned in a leisure pool at a public aquatic centre while attending with his mother and three siblings. His mother was supervising four children while also holding a 9-month-old infant, making effective supervision difficult. The child could not swim and wore no flotation device. Despite immediate CPR by a lifeguard and two present nurses, he was pronounced dead on arrival at hospital. The coroner found the lifeguard response appropriate and that parental supervision responsibility was primary, not the facility's. However, the coroner made extensive recommendations regarding pool design, lifeguard deployment, signage, supervision ratios, risk assessment protocols, and staff training to enhance child safety at public pools.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
emergency medicineintensive carepaediatricsoccupational and environmental health
mother supervising multiple children including infant
overcrowded pool environment
noise and visual obstructions in pool area
difficulty of parent maintaining visual supervision in crowded conditions
design features creating blind spots for lifeguards
spa jets creating bubbles obscuring visibility
Coroner's recommendations
All public pools in the ACT must have an audit by the Royal Life Saving Society of Australia and implement audit recommendations
Risk assessments should be conducted especially during large numbers, with recommended minimum lifeguard ratio of 1:100 but adjustable based on facility-specific factors including weather, holidays, pool layout, surface reflection, attendance, user swimming capabilities, special needs, number and distribution of users, and recreational activities
Signage regarding parental/adult supervisor responsibility must be prominent in large lettering at entry, reception, and poolside, stating 'Children under 10 must be supervised by an adult at all times when in the aquatics area'
Signage regarding pool behaviour must be prominent at entry turnstiles and poolside
Educational pamphlets should be available at pool entry
Depth indicators should be displayed where depth changes with signage 'DEPTH INCREASES – 0.6 TO 1.2M PARENTS KEEP CHILDREN AT ARMS LENGTH'
Sufficient lifeguards should be provided to supervise all water areas without obstruction; blind spots and sun glare must be considered in lifeguard deployment
Where whirlpool entry is restricted by lane rope, signage should indicate closure: 'No Access beyond this point. Whirlpool Closed to Public: No Swimming in this area'
Consider recording every incident requiring lifeguard intervention
Set limits on number of users in different pool areas with effective monitoring
Deploy at least two lifeguards constantly moving between shallow and deep areas, with particular attention to non-swimming children
Highlight pool floor gradient changes with contrasting colour, particularly between toddler/leisure pool and deeper areas
Provide minimum four quarterly lifeguard training sessions covering emergency procedures, incident response, lifesaving skills, resuscitation, oxygen equipment, first aid, deep-water retrieval, special needs populations, public relations, and practical water work
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.