cardiac arrhythmia in a man with liver failure due to cirrhosis and focal coronary arteriosclerosis
AI-generated summary
Michael John Herrick, a 44-year-old prisoner with end-stage liver cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C and alcohol abuse, died from cardiac arrhythmia at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital. He had been receiving aggressive treatment for his advanced liver disease, which was complicated by cardiac failure and hepatic encephalopathy. The coroner found the death resulted from natural causes and that the quality of supervision, treatment, and care while in custody was of high standard. However, the coroner raised significant concerns about the 'Not for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation' form process at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital. The forms lacked patient signature despite the deceased being capable of signing, and consultation with the consultant gastroenterologist was not documented. The coroner made recommendations to improve the form's completion and implementation, including requiring consultant and patient signatures, specifying review dates, and clarifying when forms should be voided.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
end-stage liver disease secondary to hepatitis C and chronic alcohol abuse
cardiac failure and cardiac disease with coronary arteriosclerosis
high caffeine levels possibly related to hepatic dysfunction
hepatic encephalopathy
Coroner's recommendations
The 'Not for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation' forms at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital should be redrafted to ensure they are signed by both the consultant and registrar treating the patient
The forms should be signed by the patient if the patient is able to sign
All forms should have a specified review date
Forms should be void in the event of a significant change in circumstances such as discharge from hospital or availability of an organ transplant
The consultant responsible for the decision should sign the form to provide protection for the registrar and clear evidence of consultant approval
Patient signature requirements should use clear language such as 'if able' rather than ambiguous terms like 'if applicable' or 'if appropriate'
Important instructions regarding when patient signatures should be obtained should be available on the form itself
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.