Allan Chapman, a 75-year-old sentenced prisoner, died of metastatic lung carcinoma on 4 April 2004 at Murdoch Community Hospice. He presented with lethargy and dysphonia in February 2004, leading to prompt chest imaging that revealed extensive lung cancer with liver metastasis. He was managed appropriately through Royal Perth Hospital's respiratory and palliative care services, with pain management optimised during hospice care. The coroner found his medical management was appropriate, with all reasonable treatment options explored by experienced physicians. The only issue identified was a procedural problem: the hospice had not been advised of Death in Custody procedures, resulting in the death scene not being sealed and family remaining with the body. The coroner recommended that community facilities accommodating sentenced prisoners be properly advised of Death in Custody procedures at the time they agree to provide care.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
palliative carerespiratory medicineoncologygeneral medicinecorrectional health
Small cell carcinoma, notoriously aggressive and resistant form of lung cancer
Liver metastasis
Bone metastasis
Adrenal gland metastasis
Coroner's recommendations
Community facilities accommodating sentenced prisoners should be properly advised of Death in Custody procedures at the time they agree to provide care for sentenced prisoners
Death in Custody procedures should be reinforced to ensure correct protocols are followed regardless of the physical location where the prisoner is accommodated
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.