Coronial
WAhome

Inquest into the Death of Joseph Charles ABELA

Deceased

Joseph Charles ABELA

Demographics

34y, male

Coroner

Coroner Jenkin

Date of death

2021-10-25

Finding date

2024-07-31

Cause of death

Gunshot injuries to chest and left shoulder

AI-generated summary

Joseph Abela, a 34-year-old with chronic paranoid schizophrenia and polysubstance use, died from gunshot wounds inflicted by police during a mental health welfare check on 25 October 2021. Critical clinical failures preceded his death: despite clear risks when unmedicated, he was not placed on a Community Treatment Order (CTO) and did not receive prescribed depot antipsychotic medication following releases from prison in March and July 2021. After his mother reported severe paranoia in October 2021, a home visit was conducted but no follow-up occurred despite documented plans. The Armadale Community Mental Health Service provided substandard care characterised by missed opportunities for assertive management. The coroner found gaps in liaison between prison and community mental health services, inadequate risk assessment, incomplete clinical records, and failure to implement planned follow-up visits. While the officers' use of force was justified when Joseph armed himself and attacked them, the death was potentially preventable with appropriate involuntary treatment and medication compliance from his release date.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatrycorrectional healthemergency medicineparamedicine

Error types

diagnosticsystemcommunicationdelay

Drugs involved

haloperidololanzapine

Clinical conditions

paranoid schizophreniacatatonic schizophreniaantisocial personality disorderpolysubstance use disorderpsychotic episodeparanoid ideation

Contributing factors

  • Failure to place on Community Treatment Order despite clear indications
  • Failure to administer prescribed depot antipsychotic medication
  • Inadequate liaison between prison and community mental health services
  • Substandard risk assessment after 6 October 2021 home visit
  • Failure to conduct planned follow-up home visit
  • Inadequate mental health service policies for management of violent/aggressive consumers
  • Incomplete clinical documentation and records
  • Lack of consultation with judicial officers regarding Form 1A status at bail hearings
  • Limited bed availability at Frankland Centre secure forensic facility
  • Patient's chronic lack of insight into mental illness and persistent non-compliance with medication
  • Patient's polysubstance use and disengagement from services

Coroner's recommendations

  1. The Department of Justice should amend relevant policies to ensure that when a prisoner who is being held on remand and is the subject of a Form 1A under the Mental Health Act 2014 (WA) appears before any court in relation to an application for bail or sentence, the presiding judicial officer is made aware of the existence of the Form 1A and the options available to the Court in dealing with that prisoner
  2. In order to ensure that the mental health of prisoners can be more effectively managed, the Department of Justice should seek approval from State Forensic Mental Health Services for all psychiatrists and mental health clinicians employed by the Department to have read-only access to PSOLIS (Psychiatric Services Online Information System)
  3. The Department of Justice and the Department of Health should confer and identify and implement strategies to ensure the effective management of the mental health of persons admitted to prison whilst the subject of a Community Treatment Order made under the Mental Health Act 2014 (WA), who are subsequently released
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.