A 27-year-old Western Australian police officer with a longstanding history of depression and anxiety took his own life using his police-issued firearm stored at home. He had struggled with mental health since 2017, attended by suicidal ideation, but avoided seeking help from police services due to perceived stigma and career consequences. He privately saw a psychologist from February 2021 but ceased medication and disengaged from psychological therapy. On the night before his death, he consumed alcohol, contacted multiple people showing marked deterioration in mental state, and made his firearm readily accessible from its storage cabinet. The coroner found the lack of mental health risk assessment before authorising home storage of a firearm contributed to preventability. Recommendations focus on comprehensive pre-deployment mental health risk assessments, reducing stigma in help-seeking, proactive engagement with officers, and better education about confidentiality protections in mental health services.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
occupational and environmental healthpsychiatrypsychologygeneral practice
major depressionanxiety disordersuicidal ideationalcohol use disorder
Contributing factors
long-standing depression and anxiety
cessation of antidepressant medication
disengagement from psychological therapy
alcohol consumption
suicidal ideation
access to police-issued firearm at home
absence of mental health risk assessment before authorisation to store firearm at home
perceived stigma around seeking help from police mental health services
fear of career consequences of disclosing mental health struggles
failure to conduct physical inspection of gun storage cabinet before authorisation
Coroner's recommendations
That the Western Australia Police Force take all reasonable steps to ensure a comprehensive mental health risk assessment is prepared in relation to every individual police officer who is to join the Traffic Motorcycle Group and who is to be authorised to store their police issued firearm at their home address, before they are authorised to do so, with a further comprehensive mental health risk assessment taking place every year the authorisation to store their police issued firearm at their home address will be renewed. In the case of police officers who are already in the Traffic Motorcycle Group and who have already been authorised to store their police issued firearm at their home, they should be strongly encouraged to participate in such comprehensive mental health risk assessments.
That the Western Australia Police Force consider the development of a comprehensive and ongoing strategy to reduce stigma within the Western Australia Police Force in relation to conversations regarding mental health and help seeking.
That the Western Australia Police Force explore further options for proactively checking in with police officers in connection with their mental health and wellbeing at various stages of their employment with the Western Australia Police Force, and that resources be allocated for this to occur. This checking in should be done in a way that allows for choice and autonomy.
That the Western Australia Police Force consider ways of disseminating further information emphasising how confidentiality provisions apply when police officers access their mental health resources, including information regarding the steps that may be taken should a mental health practitioner form a concern for a police officer's wellbeing.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.