Multiple injuries sustained from a fall from the top floor of a multi-storey carpark
AI-generated summary
Justine Painter, aged 51, died from multiple injuries sustained jumping from a multi-storey carpark while an inpatient at Royal Perth Hospital (RPH). She had severe treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder, command hallucinations, liver cirrhosis, and required secure residential care. During a planned gastroenterology admission on 28 May 2020 for blood transfusion, Mosman Park Home staff clearly communicated her high absconding risk and requirement for constant supervision via telephone conversations, a transfer form, and comprehensive medical assessment. However, RPH nursing staff failed to read the transfer documentation, did not conduct a mental health risk assessment on admission, and progressively allowed unsupervised leave despite previous absconding incidents and clear warnings from her guardian and residential facility staff. She left the ward on 4 June and died. Coroner found this preventable—a one-to-one nursing special would have mitigated the risk. Communication failures within RPH, not inadequate handover from the residential facility, were the core problem. RPH has since implemented improved interfacility transfer protocols requiring clinician-to-clinician handover and holistic multidisciplinary risk assessment.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
gastroenterologypsychiatryhepatologyemergency medicine
Failure of RPH nursing staff to read transfer documentation identifying absconding risk
Absence of mental health risk assessment on admission to general medical ward
Failure to allocate one-to-one nursing observation despite known high absconding risk
Progressive unsupervised leave allowed after initial settling-in period
Dismissal of concerns raised directly by guardian and residential facility staff
Poor communication within Ward 8A between nursing and medical teams
Assumptions that patient would return as she had done previously
Absence of psychiatric liaison nurse review
Placement in general gastroenterology ward rather than psychiatric ward despite complex psychiatric history
Insufficient information provided in electronic bed management system at time of booking
Coroner's recommendations
All admissions and transfers of patient care must be accompanied by appropriate clinical handover with clinicians responsible for reviewing transfer records
Clerical staff to provide interfacility transfer records to admitting nurse for review before filing
For multi-day admissions from residential facilities, receiving staff must contact the facility to seek verbal clinician-to-clinician handover to verify information and identify risks
When patients convert from day admission to multi-day admission, hospital staff must recontact external facility for verbal handover due to inferred change in condition
Risk information for known regular patients should be flagged at the time of booking by the doctor arranging admission
Holistic assessment of patients incorporating all health issues (physical and psychiatric) should occur across all wards, not just geriatric services
Multidisciplinary admission forms should be implemented to ensure medical, nursing, and allied health input from the outset
Implementation of auditing processes to ensure standards are met for comprehensive holistic patient care
Greater emphasis on psychiatric liaison nurse review for patients with known mental health history admitted to general medical wards
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.