Jeremy Scott, a 63-year-old prisoner, died from metastatic rectal carcinoma on 3 July 2017. From 2015 onwards, he reported rectal and anal symptoms including pain, bleeding, and palpable masses, which were repeatedly attributed to haemorrhoids. Key missed diagnostic opportunities occurred in September 2015 (Dr Chuka—patient declined rectal examination), November 2016 (Dr Thillainathan—referral omitted mention of palpable mass, 100-day delay to surgical review), March 2017 (Dr Hendry—external examination only, no rectal examination), and May 2017 (ED assessment missed large rectal mass despite examination). Annual health reviews, faecal occult blood testing, and weight monitoring were not performed. Had colonoscopy been offered and accepted in 2015, tumour may have been curable; if diagnosed in 2016-2017, treatment might have prolonged life and reduced suffering. The coroner identified systemic failures in referral tracking, communication between clinicians, and prison health screening protocols. Clinicians must actively investigate red-flag symptoms rather than accept patient self-diagnosis of benign conditions.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general surgerycolorectal surgeryemergency medicinecorrectional healthpalliative carepathology
Error types
diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay
Clinical conditions
metastatic rectal carcinomarectal cancer with hepatic metastasesanal fissurehaemorrhoidsliver failure secondary to metastatic diseasehuman papillomavirus infection (HPV genotypes 16 and 18)adeno-squamous carcinoma of rectum
Procedures
rectal examinationcolonoscopy (not performed)examination under anaestheticbiopsy
Contributing factors
failure to refer for colonoscopy in September 2015 despite patient report of rectal lump and pain
assumption by multiple clinicians that symptoms were benign (haemorrhoids, anal fissure) without adequate investigation
100-day delay between referral to surgeon and first appointment (referred 23 November 2016, seen 1 March 2017) with no system to monitor overdue referrals
referral communication omitted key finding of palpable rectal mass
patient refusal of rectal examinations not managed with offer of examination under sedation/anaesthesia
incomplete rectal examination by registrar in ED on 26 May 2017 due to patient pain and inexperience
failure to perform annual health reviews 2015-2017
failure to perform faecal occult blood testing
failure to monitor weight loss over time
lack of systematic follow-up for overdue specialist referrals in prison health system
no documentation of risks when patient declined examination
external examination only by surgeon on 1 March 2017 despite patient declining internal examination
Coroner's recommendations
To ensure that when prisoners are referred to external agencies those referrals are managed in a timely and appropriate manner, the Department of Justice (DOJ) should consider establishing a system that alerts the Prison Health Service when such referrals are overdue. DOJ should also consider allocating sufficient resources to enable a project team to be established to finalise the work currently being undertaken by Dr Joy Rowland in establishing a system to monitor and track these referrals.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) should consider amending the Health Services Policy relating to annual health reviews so that priority is given to reviewing vulnerable and older prisoners. Further, DOJ should allocate appropriate resources to enable these annual reviews to be conducted in a timely manner.
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.