Coronial
WAhome

Inquest into the Death of Satwant KAUR

Deceased

Satwant KAUR

Demographics

57y, female

Date of death

2013-12-05

Cause of death

Multiple penetrating (stab) injuries to the body and neck

AI-generated summary

Satwant Kaur, aged 57, was murdered by her stepson in her home on 5 December 2013 after he made multiple threats to kill her while in custody. Critical failures in intelligence sharing between the Department of Corrective Services and WA Police prevented the deceased from being warned of credible threats. Three threats made by the stepson between 14-18 November 2013 were not effectively communicated to police before his bail release on 20 November 2013 to the family home. Communication delays, system incompatibilities, and unclear responsibility protocols meant opportunities to warn the deceased were missed on at least four separate dates. The coroner found that while the stepson bore direct responsibility for the homicide, systemic failures in threat assessment and inter-agency communication created preventable conditions enabling the tragedy. Key issues included delayed intelligence transfer between agencies, unclear ownership of threat investigations, incorrect address information in police systems, and lack of consultation with bail address residents.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Error types

communicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

methamphetamine

Contributing factors

  • Failure to communicate threat made on 15 November 2013 to police in timely manner
  • Failure to communicate threats made on 14 and 18 November 2013 until after deceased's death
  • Intelligence not entered into police data management system until 28 November 2013, days after release on bail
  • Incorrect address for deceased in police records (Fremantle instead of Koondoola)
  • Lack of ownership and responsibility for threat investigation across police units
  • System incompatibility between DCS and WAPoL databases
  • Bail granted to family home without consultation with residents
  • Stepson's father unaware son was in custody or bailed to family address
  • Stepson released on bail on 20 November 2013 to address where deceased resided

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Bail should only be granted where the residents of the address at which the bailee intends to reside have been consulted and consent to the bailee residing at the address
  2. Proper investigation of a threat to kill any person should not be confined to police Family Protection Units even when involving intrafamilial parties
Full text
Official source Archived copy

Related cases from WA

WAhome2025-12-22

Inquest into the Death of Child LK (Name Subject to Suppression Order)

14y · Male·epilepsy in a boy with Influenza B and COVID-19 infections

A 14-year-old Aboriginal boy with newly diagnosed epilepsy died unexpectedly on 24 August 2023 after an unwitnessed seizure while sleeping at his residential care home. He had been diagnosed with epilepsy in June 2023 fo…

paediatricsneurologycommunicationsystemsodium valproate
WAhome2025-07-23

Inquest into the Death of Lynn Marie CANNON

51y · Female·sharp force injuries to the chest

Lynn Cannon, 51, was murdered by her estranged husband Paul Cannon on 5 December 2022 after discovering she had a new partner. Her sister called police at 7:30 pm expressing serious concerns for Lynn's safety, noting tha…

systemcommunication
WAhome2025-02-12

Inquest into the Death of Kimberley Michael VULICH

64y · Male·complications in association with thermal injuries in a man with underlying chro…

Kim Vulich, a 64-year-old man with decompensated liver cirrhosis from chronic alcohol use, developed hepatic encephalopathy and cognitive impairment including possible Korsakoff syndrome. Despite SAT guardianship orders …

general medicinegeriatric medicinecommunicationdelay

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.