Coronial
WAmental health

Inquest into the Death of Frances May COOPER

Deceased

Frances May COOPER

Demographics

48y, female

Coroner

Coroner King

Date of death

2011-10-30

Finding date

2015-11-30

Cause of death

head injury sustained when struck by a train

AI-generated summary

Frances May Cooper, 48, a patient with chronic paranoid schizophrenia, died from head injuries after being struck by a train while on unescorted leave from the Kalgoorlie Regional Hospital mental health unit. She was an involuntary patient who had been assessed as low suicide risk that morning despite significant risk factors. The decision to allow unsupervised smoking breaks was problematic given her acute psychosis, impaired insight, poor medication compliance, recent cannabis use, and known pattern of absconding. Contributing systemic failures included inadequate community mental health care following her discharge from Norseman (creating relapse risk), poorly documented informal risk assessments, lack of a multidisciplinary team approach, absence of family collaboration despite explicit family concerns about her safety around her birthday, lack of secure smoking area (due to hospital smoking ban), and insufficient psychiatrist oversight. The coroner found the overall standard of care at the mental health unit unsatisfactory, though did not fault individual clinicians.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatryemergency medicine

Error types

systemcommunicationdelayprocedural

Drugs involved

risperidonecannabiscannabis

Clinical conditions

chronic paranoid schizophreniaacute psychosisauditory hallucinationsdelusionsimpaired insightpoor medication compliancesubstance use disorder cannabis

Contributing factors

  • decision to allow unescorted leave for an involuntary patient with active psychotic symptoms and absconding risk
  • gaps in community mental health care following discharge from Norseman in May 2011
  • informal and poorly documented risk assessment processes
  • failure to involve family in care planning despite explicit family concerns about safety
  • lack of multidisciplinary team involvement
  • lack of secure smoking area due to Department of Health smoking prohibition on hospital grounds
  • poor medication compliance and cannabis use contributing to mental state deterioration
  • inconsistency between psychiatrist discharge recommendations and actual discharge decisions
  • lack of continuity of psychiatric care (four different psychiatrists in 2010-2011)
  • limited psychiatrist oversight of nursing decisions regarding leave
  • reliance on patient's promise to return despite known history of dishonesty and poor insight

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Development of a process to transfer case management within the Goldfields Mental Health Service
  2. Development of improved processes to transfer information with patients including daily communication between Mental Health Inpatient Service and Community Mental Health Service
  3. Development of processes to ensure case management of patients including follow-up of overdue medication
  4. Development of a process to ensure information from family and carers is documented and included in care planning
  5. Development of a standard process for risk assessment and documentation over the course of treatment
  6. Development of training for mental health staff, ED staff and hospital coordinator staff in mental state examination as annual core competency
  7. Development of a process for recording leave of absence of involuntary patients from the mental health unit
  8. Ensuring treatment planning and review includes the treating psychiatrist and is consistent with the psychiatrist's documented intentions
  9. Review of the procedure for discharge of patients from the mental health unit
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.