Coronial
VICother

Finding into death of Darryn Leslie Beaton

Deceased

Darryn Leslie Beaton

Demographics

22y, male

Coroner

Coroner David Ryan

Date of death

1984-11-28

Finding date

2026-03-05

Cause of death

Unascertained

AI-generated summary

A 22-year-old male with schizophrenia disappeared on 28 November 1984 after ceasing prescribed medication approximately six months prior. He left home to withdraw money from a bank but was never seen again. His vehicle was found abandoned in dense bushland in Grampians National Park four days later. Extensive police searches and subsequent investigations over 40 years found no remains or evidence of survival. The coroner concluded he is deceased but the exact cause remains unascertained, likely involving mental health decompensation, becoming lost in bushland, and death from exposure or possible suicide. This case highlights the critical importance of medication adherence in schizophrenia management, family involvement in monitoring mental state changes, and early intervention when patients discontinue psychiatric treatment.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatry

Clinical conditions

schizophreniamental ill-health

Contributing factors

  • Ceased psychiatric medication approximately 6 months prior to disappearance
  • Schizophrenia with symptoms of hearing voices and becoming distracted
  • Mental ill-health at time of disappearance
  • Possible loss or injury in dense bushland
  • Possible suicide
  • Exposure to elements
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.