Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Alan John Trevor Deem

Deceased

Alan John Trevor Deem

Demographics

67y, male

Coroner

Coroner John Olle

Date of death

2020-10-19

Finding date

2025-04-03

Cause of death

Intracranial haemorrhage complicating coronary artery bypass graft surgery following right coronary artery dissection sustained in percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease

AI-generated summary

A 67-year-old man died from intracranial haemorrhage following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. He had suffered a right coronary artery dissection during percutaneous coronary intervention at Sunshine Hospital and was transferred to Royal Melbourne Hospital for cardiothoracic surgery. A significant delay occurred between detection of the dissection (9:12 AM) and referral (approximately 12:45 PM, transfer at 3 PM). Critical deficiencies in medical record-keeping at both hospitals prevented determination of whether the delay contributed to death. The coroner found suboptimal inter-hospital transfer procedures, lack of contemporaneous documentation of the referral discussion, and breach of the receiving hospital's own record-keeping policies. While medical management was deemed reasonable, systemic failures in documentation and communication protocols were identified as preventable factors in future similar cases.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

cardiologycardiothoracic surgeryanaesthesiahaematology

Error types

communicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

dual anti-platelet agentsanticoagulant therapy

Clinical conditions

acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarctionleft ventricular dysfunctioncoronary artery dissectionright coronary artery occlusionsecond acute myocardial infarctionright ventricular failureacute kidney injuryischaemic hepatitisventilator-associated pneumoniapost-operative bleedingintracranial haemorrhage

Procedures

percutaneous coronary interventioncoronary artery stentingcoronary artery bypass graftinganaesthetic inductionextracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Contributing factors

  • Right coronary artery dissection during percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Significant delay between detection of coronary occlusion (9:12 AM) and referral (approximately 12:45 PM), approximately 6 hours
  • Suboptimal record-keeping practices at Sunshine Hospital
  • Suboptimal record-keeping practices at Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Lack of contemporaneous documentation of inter-hospital referral discussion
  • Reliance on verbal handover without written documentation
  • Absence of documented rationale for change in management plan from conservative to surgical
  • Unclear timing and decision-making regarding transfer decision
  • Inadequate post-operative anticoagulation management
  • Right ventricular failure requiring ECMO support
  • Multiple post-operative complications including renal failure, hepatitis, and ventilator-acquired pneumonia

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Western Health should determine whether the delay in referral was exacerbated by lack of documentation or medical records
  2. Western Health should develop and implement measures to ensure referrals are expedited or completed in a timely manner
  3. Royal Melbourne Hospital should develop and implement a process to ensure clinicians comply with their own record-keeping policies
  4. Royal Melbourne Hospital should develop a toolkit to facilitate clinician compliance with their record-keeping policies
  5. Victorian Department of Health should encourage and facilitate the roll-out of CareSync Exchange system or similar program with functionality to facilitate inter-hospital transfer documentation with real-time communication between referring and receiving hospitals
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.