Hypovolaemic and cardiogenic shock (hysterectomy) in the context of cardiomegaly, cirrhosis and coagulopathy
AI-generated summary
A 62-year-old woman with significant comorbidities (cirrhosis, cardiomegaly, thrombocytopenia, chronic kidney disease, COPD) died from hypovolaemic and cardiogenic shock during elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy for an endometrial polyp. Intraoperative blood loss was 2000-2500mls (far exceeding typical 150-200mls). Critical gaps included: surgery commenced without immediate platelet availability despite platelet count of 51 (lower limit acceptable); unrecognised right ventricular hypertrophy with probable pulmonary hypertension missed on pre-anaesthetic evaluation; inadequate pre-operative optimisation planning; no specialist cardiology or hepatology review despite severe liver disease; and lack of communication between pre-anaesthetic clinic and surgical team regarding investigation results. The cervical stenosis and complex adhesions encountered should have prompted consideration of conversion to open surgery earlier. Had platelets been available pre-operatively and cardiac complexity been recognised, the outcome may have differed.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
total laparoscopic hysterectomylaparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomyconversion to laparotomyhysteroscopyendometrial curettagepipelle endometrial samplingcentral venous line insertionarterial line insertionintubation and general anaesthesia
Contributing factors
Underestimation of medical complexity, particularly unrecognised right ventricular hypertrophy and probable pulmonary hypertension
Absence of pre-operative specialist hepatology review despite severe liver disease
Absence of pre-operative specialist cardiology review and collaboration
Surgery commenced without immediate access to platelets despite thrombocytopenia (platelet count 51)
Lack of documentation and review of pre-operative investigations during PAC homework session
Cervical stenosis preventing use of standard cervicovaginal delineator instrument
Complex pelvic and abdominal adhesions not fully anticipated
Excessive intraoperative blood loss (2000-2500mls vs expected 150-200mls)
Limited cardiovascular response to blood loss due to underlying cardiac disease
Inadequate communication between pre-anaesthetic clinic and surgical team
Disseminated intravascular coagulation secondary to blood loss, cirrhosis and coagulopathy
Coroner's recommendations
Goulburn Valley Health should review policies to ensure patients are not placed on waiting list for surgery until final sign off of all investigations requested during pre-anaesthetic consultation
Goulburn Valley Health should work with echocardiography services to streamline assessments for patients with reduced exercise tolerance and possible underlying cardiac problems
Goulburn Valley Health should review the system of communication between pre-anaesthetic clinic and surgical teams to ensure surgeons are apprised of PAC review outcomes, management plans and requests for further investigations
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists should liaise with Department of Health to explore development of a laparoscopic surgery database within Victoria to enhance quality and accountability, enabling access to live outcome data, feedback to clinicians, targeted training, and recommendations regarding service capability
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.