Multisystem organ failure and hypoxic/ischaemic encephalopathy following anaphylactic reaction to CT contrast medium
AI-generated summary
Peta Hickey, a 43-year-old company executive with no cardiac history, died from anaphylaxis to CT coronary angiogram contrast after her employer commissioned an inappropriate screening program. The referral lacked clinical indication and was signed by a doctor who had never examined her. The radiologist proceeded without adequate investigation. When anaphylaxis occurred, the radiologist failed to recognise it and did not administer adrenaline—the life-saving treatment. No procedural errors by ambulance services. Critical lessons: contrast-based procedures require proper medical assessment before referral; radiologists must reject invalid referrals; anaphylaxis must be recognised immediately and treated with IM adrenaline without delay; private medical businesses motivated by profit prioritised throughput over patient safety.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Inappropriate referral for CT coronary angiogram for screening purposes in asymptomatic patient
Referral lacked clinical indication and adequate patient assessment
Doctor's signature used without reviewing the patient
Radiologist proceeded with procedure despite invalid referral
Failure to recognise anaphylaxis
Failure to administer intramuscular adrenaline
Hydrocortisone administered instead of adrenaline
Pre-medication with beta-blocker (metoprolol) not communicated to paramedics
Radiologist poorly trained in anaphylaxis management
Coroner's recommendations
RANZCR implement mandatory requirement for radiologists to undertake specific training in recognition and management of severe contrast reactions and anaphylaxis every 3 years
RANZCR, ASCIA and ARC develop comprehensive training and certification programme for radiologists in anaphylaxis management and CPR/basic life support
RANZCR implement register of severe contrast reactions to assess effectiveness of training and compliance with guidelines
RANZCR amend contrast reaction management guidelines for display highlighting adrenaline is life-saving and must be used promptly, and role of glucagon in beta-blocked patients
RANZCR amend Standard 5.3.2 requiring rejection or return of referrals with no/inadequate clinical information if referring doctor cannot be contacted
RANZCR prepare joint position statement with CSANZ regarding when screening is acceptable indicator for CT angiogram
RANZCR prepare joint position statements on when screening is acceptable for other imaging procedures
RANZCR update standards and guidelines to address increasing prevalence of screening requests and ensure procedures not performed for screening when lower-risk alternatives available
MRPB review and update Professional Capabilities for Medical Radiation Practitioners to ensure emergency response adequately addressed
MRPB update CPD guidelines requiring all radiographers working with contrast media ensure consistent training in emergency response to severe reactions and anaphylaxis
RANZCR, ASCIA, ARC and ASMIRT develop and implement training and certification programme for radiographers in anaphylaxis recognition and management, CPR, basic life support with triannual recertification, including ability to administer adrenaline via autoinjector
MRPB, RANZCR and ASMIRT consider expanding radiographers' scope to include preparation and administration of emergency medications
FMIG stock adrenaline auto-injectors in addition to vials
FMIG revise consent process to include clearly identified consent form for CTCA with specific reference to RANZCR guideline items including radiation risk and alternatives
RANZCR update standards regarding radiology practices to ensure adrenaline auto-injectors accessible in every room where contrast administered; policies for responding to inappropriate requests occur promptly; consent procedures include alternatives appropriate to individual circumstances; all radiographers trained in anaphylaxis recognition and management; staff trained and empowered to raise issues in emergencies; onboarding systems for new radiologists include orientation to emergency equipment and assurance of training recency; contrast reaction treatment guideline prominently displayed in all rooms
DIAS Advisory Committee review DIAS Practice Accreditation Standards ensuring adrenaline auto-injectors accessible; policies for responding to inappropriate requests occur promptly; consent procedures include alternatives; all radiographers trained in anaphylaxis; staff trained and empowered to raise issues; new radiologist onboarding systems with emergency equipment orientation; contrast reaction treatment guideline displayed
RANZCR and DIAS consult each other on distribution of efforts and work together to communicate any changes
FMIG review compliance with DIAS Practice Accreditation Standard 2.1
Commonwealth Minister for Health audit all Australian accredited diagnostic imaging practices regarding compliance with DIAS Standard 2.1
Commonwealth Minister for Health produce and promulgate standard forms for referrals to diagnostic imaging practices with clinical information and contact details, considering whether to mandate use
ACCC consider whether enforcement action appropriate against Priority Care Health Solutions, MRI Now regarding unconscionable, misleading and deceptive conduct giving false impressions regarding medical practitioner review
RACGP and AFOEM prepare joint position statement on whether practitioners engaged in workplace health have different obligations to 'clients' versus 'patients'
RACGP and AFOEM prepare joint position statement on appropriateness of practitioner authorising use of signature in referrals for tests when patient not reviewed
Ambulance Victoria issue practice advisory highlighting adrenaline be administered as soon as practicable to patients who acutely deteriorated within short time of receiving radiological contrast
Ambulance Victoria issue practice advisory highlighting possibility of beta-blocking medication in anaphylaxis to radiological contrast and consideration of glucagon if unresponsive to adrenaline
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —