Mitchell Dowling, a 20-year-old university student, died by hanging on 18 July 2018 after a period of psychological treatment for depression with suicidal ideation. He had presented with major depressive disorder with atypical features, binge drinking, and two prior self-asphyxiation attempts while intoxicated. A psychologist treated him for eight sessions (July-September 2017), after which he declined further treatment. Ten months later, following an argument with housemates and alcohol consumption, he died. The coroner identified a lost opportunity: the psychologist did not provide written diagnostic information to the patient or actively encourage family involvement in his care, despite recognising protective factors in his family support network. The coroner emphasised that written information about relapse signs and proactive family engagement might have improved outcomes had he experienced mental health deterioration.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
high blood alcohol level (0.14g/mL) at time of death
lack of ongoing psychiatric involvement
limited family engagement in mental health care
absence of written diagnostic information provided to patient
Coroner's recommendations
The APS, ACPA and AAP should advise members that when treating young adults, unless clear reasons contraindicate, they should provide written information about the diagnosis including future symptoms indicating relapse and need for further therapy, which can be shared with family, friends and supports
The APS, ACPA and AAP should advise members that when treating young adults with self-harm and suicide issues, management should include exploring the option for patient approval/consent for the psychologist to directly consult with parents or partners about the patient's condition and needed supports
The APS, ACPA and AAP should advise members that when treating young adults, management should include establishing whether the patient has discussed treatment and diagnosis with family, friends and supports, and if not, encourage and provide strategies for such discussion
The APS, ACPA and AAP should advise members that when psychiatric care is considered appropriate for young adults, clear advice should be provided on how to access such care and the general practitioner should be promptly notified to facilitate access
The APS, ACPA and AAP should remind members of the exemption in Health Privacy Principle 2.4 of the Health Records Act 2001 (Vic) permitting disclosure of health information to immediate family members on compassionate grounds
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —