Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Barry Brown

Deceased

Barry Brown

Demographics

56y, male

Coroner

Coroner Darren Bracken

Date of death

2013-03-27

Finding date

2021-07-20

Cause of death

Internal blood loss, complications arising from laparoscopic cholecystectomy

AI-generated summary

Barry Brown, a 56-year-old man, died from internal bleeding after laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to critical systemic failures in post-operative care and diagnosis. Following hypotension at 7:30pm, nursing staff failed to follow escalation protocols and a doctor was not called until 7:45pm. Critical delays occurred in notifying the operating surgeon (9:30pm) and in assembling the surgical team. However, the primary failure was a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock rather than hypovolaemic shock, driven by confirmation bias in the anaesthetist, which prevented timely return to theatre. Inadequate fluid resuscitation, failure of senior consultants to attend the hospital, and poor inter-specialist communication all contributed. Had Mr Brown been returned to theatre before midnight, survival was likely. The coroner found the death potentially preventable and made recommendations regarding escalation protocols, surgeon notification, inter-specialist communication, and education on confirmation bias.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

general surgeryintensive careanaesthesia

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationdelaysystem

Drugs involved

noradrenalineadrenalinevasopressin

Clinical conditions

hypovolaemic shockinternal bleedingpost-operative haemorrhagecardiogenic shock (diagnostic error)hypotension

Procedures

laparoscopic cholecystectomyoperative cholangiogramdiagnostic laparoscopyintubationtransthoracic echocardiogramendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP)

Contributing factors

  • Failure of nursing staff to follow escalation algorithm and call code blue
  • Delay in notifying operating surgeon (9:30pm vs. 7:30pm hypotension detected)
  • Delay in surgeon attending hospital (2 hours from initial call)
  • Inadequate fluid resuscitation in early phases
  • Diagnosis of cardiogenic shock rather than hypovolaemic shock
  • Confirmation bias in clinical decision-making
  • Failure to check central venous pressure
  • Failure of senior consultants to attend hospital in person
  • Poor inter-specialist communication; reliance on junior doctor intermediaries
  • Excessive delay awaiting echocardiogram (2 hours vs. ~30 minutes appropriate)
  • Possible unligated cystic artery or dislodged surgical clip

Coroner's recommendations

  1. The Western Hospital should provide specific periodic training to nursing staff on strict compliance with escalation algorithms and circumstances for calling code blue
  2. The Western Hospital should explicitly include in procedures and protocols the requirement that a surgeon be immediately notified if a post-operative patient experiences hypotension and that the surgeon (or nominee) assess the patient as soon as possible
  3. The Western Hospital should formulate and promulgate written policy setting out when on-call and consultant physicians treating one patient should: (A) speak directly to each other rather than managing treatment indirectly through junior physicians or remotely, particularly when one proposes treatment with which another has reservations or when patient condition precipitously changes; and (B) themselves go to the hospital and assess the patient
  4. The Australian Medical Council should include in physician training syllabus explicit and detailed material analysing confirmation bias, its nature, manifestation and potentially fatal effects
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.