Finding into death of Brett Maybus
Deceased
Brett Maybus
Demographics
60y, male
Date of death
2017-08-29
Finding date
2020-01-31
Cause of death
Haemorrhage complicating a left robotic upper mediastinal lymph node clearance in a man with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, secondary to rupture of a blood vessel compromised by previous radiation therapy
AI-generated summary
Brett Maybus, aged 60, died from massive haemorrhage following robotic mediastinal lymph node dissection for recurrent metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. The coroner found the fatal bleed was likely caused by rupture of a blood vessel compromised by previous high-dose radiotherapy to that region. The critical clinical lesson concerns informed consent: while the patient was a well-informed, intelligent man who consented to surgery, the surgeons did not adequately disclose the specific heightened risk of vascular damage from prior radiation in that anatomical zone. The coroner noted this was a material risk that should have been explicitly conveyed to enable fully informed consent. Although the coroner concluded the patient would likely have consented anyway given his limited curative options, the failure to document and specifically discuss this radiation-specific risk in medical records represents a preventable gap in the consent process.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Failure to adequately disclose heightened risk of vascular damage from previous radiotherapy
- Inadequate documentation of risk discussions in medical records
- Assumption that patient's awareness of prior chest irradiation was sufficient to convey specific vascular risk
- Severe ischaemic heart disease (85-95% coronary artery stenosis) may have contributed to inability to resuscitate
- Rupture of blood vessel in heavily irradiated mediastinal region
Coroner's recommendations
- Document discussions regarding attendant risks of proposed procedures in medical records, particularly risks specific to the individual patient
- Consider audio recording of risk disclosure discussions to provide contemporaneous evidence if consent issues subsequently become contentious
- Surgeons should explicitly disclose heightened vascular risks when operating in previously heavily irradiated fields, rather than assuming patient awareness of prior radiation is sufficient
- Consent processes should specifically address patient-specific (subjective) risks in addition to general procedural risks, and these discussions should be documented
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —