Trevor O'Brien, aged 63, died from chest injuries sustained while performing DIY maintenance on his caravan. He improperly used the caravan's jockey-wheel as a vehicle jack to support the vehicle's weight while working underneath it. The jockey-wheel clamp slipped, causing the A-frame to collapse onto his chest, resulting in mechanical asphyxia. This case highlights a significant gap in consumer product safety standards. Jockey-wheels are designed only to raise and lower loads for attachment purposes, not to support weight during work underneath vehicles. The coroner emphasized that no specific Consumer Protection Notice exists for jockey-wheels under Australian Consumer Law, despite 120 Australians dying from similar DIY vehicle maintenance accidents between 2000-2019. The death was preventable through proper use of appropriate safety equipment (support stands) and clearer mandatory warning labelling on jockey-wheel products.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Lack of mandatory safety warnings on jockey-wheels
DIY vehicle maintenance without appropriate safety equipment
Coroner's recommendations
Commonwealth Minister responsible for administering the Australian Consumer Law should make a Safety Standard in relation to jockey-wheels pursuant to Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2 Chapter 3 Part 3-3 Division 1 Section 104
Safety Standard should require suppliers of jockey-wheels to indicate that jockey-wheels should not be used as vehicle jacks and should never be used to allow individuals to work beneath a vehicle
Safety Standard should require suppliers of jockey-wheels to employ warning notices, instructions and/or permanent, legible product labels to indicate the warnings
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —