Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Sally Elizabeth Hopwood

Deceased

Sally Elizabeth Hopwood

Demographics

57y, female

Coroner

Coroner Peter White

Date of death

2012-04-01

Finding date

2017-12-21

Cause of death

Haemothorax following acute thoracic aortic dissection in a woman with congenital heart disease

AI-generated summary

Sally Hopwood, 57, with Turner syndrome, coarctation of the aorta, and bicuspid aortic valve, presented to ED on 23 March 2012 with severe acute back and chest pain (8/10). A chest X-ray revealed widened mediastinum. She was admitted to CCU under cardiologist Dr G.. Over 8 days, her presentation was reinterpreted as abdominal pathology (suspected choledocholithiasis, later pneumonia), despite imaging showing bilateral effusions. No CT chest was ordered despite her high-risk cardiac history and the X-ray findings. She died from ruptured thoracic aortic dissection with haemothorax. Key failures: Dr G. did not review the X-ray report; inadequate handover between Dr C. and Dr G. regarding the X-ray significance; misattribution of findings to abdominal pathology; missed opportunity when CT cholangiogram revealed lung effusions. Early CT chest imaging would likely have allowed percutaneous stent treatment.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

cardiologyemergency medicineradiologynephrologygeneral surgery

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystem

Drugs involved

glyceryl trinitratemorphinecefalexinpethidineparacetamolgoptenthyroxinescitalopram

Clinical conditions

thoracic aortic dissectionhaemothoraxTurner syndromecoarctation of the aortabicuspid aortic valveaortopathyhypertension

Procedures

chest X-rayelectrocardiogramechocardiogramabdominal ultrasoundCT cholangiogramCT chest (not performed)

Contributing factors

  • Failure to diagnose aortic dissection in high-risk patient with Turner syndrome, coarctation of aorta, and bicuspid aortic valve
  • Inadequate review of chest X-ray findings showing widened mediastinum and dilated upper aorta
  • Failure to order CT chest imaging when indicated by X-ray report and clinical presentation
  • Misattribution of symptoms and imaging findings to abdominal pathology rather than aortic pathology
  • Inadequate handover communication between ED physician and receiving cardiologist regarding X-ray significance
  • Reliance on prior normal echocardiogram while ignoring that echocardiography does not visualize descending aorta
  • Failure to reconsider diagnosis when CT cholangiogram revealed bilateral effusions and lung consolidation
  • Anchoring bias on abdominal diagnosis despite atypical presentation for abdominal disease

Coroner's recommendations

  1. ED consultants at handover should provide full report to receiving physician with opportunity to discuss clinical significance of findings and patient history
  2. Receiving physicians should participate actively in handover to ensure full understanding of investigations and their interpretation
  3. In cases with fluctuating or unclear presentations, consultant specialists should conference with peers to reconsider diagnostic pathways
  4. When investigation results suggest unexpected findings (e.g., lung effusions), clinicians should reconsider original diagnostic hypothesis rather than explain away findings
  5. For high-risk cardiac patients, chest imaging should not rely solely on echocardiography, which does not visualize descending aorta
  6. When doubt persists about diagnosis despite investigation, escalation and discussion between specialists should occur before accepting benign explanations
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.