Faeculent peritonitis due to perforation of a sigmoid volvulus
AI-generated summary
Ross Butler, a 67-year-old with dementia and Parkinson's disease, presented with abdominal pain and decreased appetite. A sigmoid volvulus was identified and a rectal tube successfully inserted for decompression. Conservative management was continued, but he deteriorated and died from faeculent peritonitis secondary to bowel perforation. Critical clinical lessons include: (1) comprehensive abdominal assessment documentation by nursing staff was inadequate throughout admission; (2) post-procedure imaging results were not effectively communicated between surgical registrars; (3) medical management plans were not clearly documented or communicated to nursing staff or family; (4) vital signs were not recorded during critical overnight period; (5) while the procedure itself was appropriate, better imaging interpretation and family communication about the persistent volvulus could have facilitated earlier end-of-life discussions given his significant comorbidities.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general surgeryemergency medicine
Error types
communicationdocumentationsystem
Drugs involved
morphineoxycodone
Clinical conditions
sigmoid volvulusbowel obstructionfaeculent peritonitisbowel perforationParkinson's diseasedementiatype II diabetes mellitus
Procedures
rigid sigmoidoscopyrectal tube insertion
Contributing factors
Alzheimer's disease
persistent sigmoid volvulus after decompression attempt
inadequate documentation of abdominal assessments
poor communication between surgical team members regarding imaging results
lack of clear medical management plan documentation
omission of vital signs monitoring overnight
Coroner's recommendations
Monash Medical Centre should use this case as a training example to remind nursing staff of the importance of adequate nursing assessment and documentation
Surgical staff should be reminded of the importance of adequate communication within the surgical team and to nursing staff and patients/families
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.